Jonathan Toomim [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-12-08 📝 Original message:On Dec 9, 2015, at 7:50 ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-12-08
📝 Original message:On Dec 9, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Jorge Timón <jtimon at jtimon.cc> wrote:
> I don't undesrtand. SPV nodes won't think they are validating transactions with the new version unless they adapt to the new format. They will be simply unable to receive payments using the new format if it is a softfork (although as said I agree with making it a hardfork on the simpler design and smaller fraud proofs grounds alone).
>
Okay, I might just not understand how a sigwit payment would look to current software yet. I'll add learning about that to my to-do list...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151209/b3c8f971/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151209/b3c8f971/attachment.sig>
Published at
2023-06-07 17:45:40Event JSON
{
"id": "029e58f5f52f9fde768b5ebd62b62e1dbaad17b24b52e9f9e95ea9532eb3e9ab",
"pubkey": "0ff56c09ef879c89ea04bfa2d5f5e0d96000ed6eaf5ac38e7b538a9d92767569",
"created_at": 1686159940,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"558b0da1f3869961bbef0556878e1dd6b9ae37e86128bc130bab17f5332c918d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"326443ebf6978b7c1dcc408a41165afb12fd718b34cb60dc1be8c84109931706",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-12-08\n📝 Original message:On Dec 9, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Jorge Timón \u003cjtimon at jtimon.cc\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e I don't undesrtand. SPV nodes won't think they are validating transactions with the new version unless they adapt to the new format. They will be simply unable to receive payments using the new format if it is a softfork (although as said I agree with making it a hardfork on the simpler design and smaller fraud proofs grounds alone).\n\u003e \nOkay, I might just not understand how a sigwit payment would look to current software yet. I'll add learning about that to my to-do list...\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151209/b3c8f971/attachment.html\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 496 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151209/b3c8f971/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "046fbc44dc52fa44082e08fe7e9bcdd5f71fcfd1c7e89d8fec821ba6664bdc551fbb81aa072bf01a395310b361df7d32d038ce61447e551f09ca725f5911427f"
}