📅 Original date posted:2015-08-30
📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This is looking very good also (you've already seen it, but just
adding it to thread):
https://data.bitcoinity.org/bitcoin/block_size_votes/7d?c=block_size_vot
es&r=hour&t=bar
(site by Kacper Cieśla (comboy))
On 08/25/2015 01:46 AM, Christian Decker wrote:
> Yes, the two dimensions are orthogonal: BIP 100 support and actual
> size voting. However there seem to be a few pools which simply vote
> to support BIP100, without specifying a desired block size [1],
> hence I started tracking both on the same chart, maybe I'll split
> them into different charts to clarify.
>
> Regards, Chris
>
> [1]
> https://blockchain.info/tx/ba1e5d21a340772d637ee5dc0bde8072ad1a7b499ba
241d5bfaae9618749531e
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:46 PM Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at gmail.com
> <mailto:jgarzik at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> There is a duplicated column.
>
> BIP 100 voting is /BV\d+/
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>
> I hacked together a simple tracking page for the 'block votes', it
> currently includes the 8MB vote and XT, as well as the /BV\d+/ vote
> for generic size: http://bitcoinstats.com/network/votes/
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:25 AM odinn via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>
> Hello Nicolas,
>
> On 08/20/2015 08:49 PM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>> A visualization I would like to see would include:
>
>>> pie graph(s) of what % are voting for (BIP 100, BIP 101,
> 8MB, BIP
>>> sipa
>> etc) based on what's published in blocks.
>
>> If such a vote existed, I would gladly show the pie on
> BIPxDevs.
>> However there is no standard way for miners to vote
> informally BIP
>> they support.
>
> What about formal votes? Is there a way to visually have them
> appear in a pie chart as the votes become apparent in blocks?
>
> I appreciate good visualizations and am trying to get a (visual)
> comparison of the votes on these competing proposals.
>
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing
>> list bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing
> list bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing
> list bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
- --
http://abis.io ~
"a protocol concept to enable decentralization
and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good"
https://keybase.io/odinn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV4rRSAAoJEGxwq/inSG8C7gIIALRgWbwf447+B202oUOmtGW6
1CVBJX415PyOmBLqbKBgIRLhQm3rOa0WRcjYejHM2PJLz2XIAyLouOoxiy+rcwX4
yIqEX33El+evgDpFZPjHUYq15mMtP0+jnzwZvyYrCP41m1MUoXwOWDYnf8X+q4yb
h2eiApU4fRJmzDYWWzVmoWTYFEzjmNW95vSOTSCFxuvx2A6227vyJI1irQ9EDi7+
UVdvNqTIXTmNDDJBmIsUeWkSe7fAkgyejxD2S08zEUuLR8w3S+9JYJ0rDTMkl4PR
EEnuL1M34WMuT7uQIjeQ/5L3voMefKAjCcwiX/lvk2G+YKXXhQhqNy1uyPfJgyI=
=YUJa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----