Someone should do a relay that is very-high signal. It can issue shares of revenue of that relay and then charge for each note submitted to it.
Shareholders take a cut of the revenue, but are bound to vote on whether a note is worth being published or not. If they vote no when most people voted yes or vice-versa they lose a small fraction of their shares, the shares go to those who voted with the majority.
Would this work? Why not?
fiatjaf /
npub180…jh6w6
2023-03-07 23:07:54
Author Public Key
npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6Published at
2023-03-07 23:07:54Event JSON
{
"id": "02d0b1a689ff31d6f98e0c72ae41f519f3b01cc7333fbd481261d302c9cbe63d",
"pubkey": "3bf0c63fcb93463407af97a5e5ee64fa883d107ef9e558472c4eb9aaaefa459d",
"created_at": 1678230474,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Someone should do a relay that is very-high signal. It can issue shares of revenue of that relay and then charge for each note submitted to it.\n\nShareholders take a cut of the revenue, but are bound to vote on whether a note is worth being published or not. If they vote no when most people voted yes or vice-versa they lose a small fraction of their shares, the shares go to those who voted with the majority.\n\nWould this work? Why not?",
"sig": "3a9f0ffa4097c5b8faad245b308dd698947ae5231d83a76a48881732b55821a12d0897718d51f4a3c727f470663371695750582805e6826422ef45c07c66cbb2"
}