📅 Original date posted:2018-05-14
📝 Original message:Good morning Luke,
> (Maybe it should be the first output
>
> instead of the last... Is there any legitimate reason one would have multiple
>
> such dummy outputs?)
None, but how about use of `SIGHASH_SINGLE` flag? If a dummy output is added as the first, would it not require adjustment of the inputs of the transaction?
In context you are discussing the transaction serialization, though, so perhaps `SIGHASH_SINGLE`, is unaffected?
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
ZmnSCPxj [ARCHIVE] /
npub1g5…3ms3l
2023-06-07 18:11:57
in reply to nevent1q…nhpm
Author Public Key
npub1g5zswf6y48f7fy90jf3tlcuwdmjn8znhzaa4vkmtxaeskca8hpss23ms3lPublished at
2023-06-07 18:11:57Event JSON
{
"id": "0f2353b9c22f3218cec441cca1d8c408a17b766cce9a5ed463074f1496dc6b6a",
"pubkey": "4505072744a9d3e490af9262bfe38e6ee5338a77177b565b6b37730b63a7b861",
"created_at": 1686161517,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"caee4e3828cad70a0aa9bfba9569480bc6157a528d4896eeab11f571613a9d97",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cdd6846ecee4d01f131c33af64cc0c6ab1472f754972351bdf135d75e7ed1e0a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4505072744a9d3e490af9262bfe38e6ee5338a77177b565b6b37730b63a7b861"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-05-14\n📝 Original message:Good morning Luke,\n\n\u003e (Maybe it should be the first output\n\u003e \n\u003e instead of the last... Is there any legitimate reason one would have multiple\n\u003e \n\u003e such dummy outputs?)\n\nNone, but how about use of `SIGHASH_SINGLE` flag? If a dummy output is added as the first, would it not require adjustment of the inputs of the transaction?\n\nIn context you are discussing the transaction serialization, though, so perhaps `SIGHASH_SINGLE`, is unaffected?\n\nRegards,\nZmnSCPxj",
"sig": "83738bf20e0056ed02947a0a8974dc2ff290600eeeecf958d83ea15edc0521a00db97c3564cb269815ba04a1747adb6d8fac92a29589bc7e6c91f9b434418e0f"
}