📅 Original date posted:2015-01-19
📝 Original message:I'm a bit confused. It's been a long time since I looked at protobuf
(and will have to dig into it soon), but I seem to recall it doesn't
have any of the determinism properties you guys just said. It is
intended to allow you to skip details of the on-the-wire representations
and just send a bunch of named fields between systems. I thought there
was no guarantee that two identical protobuf structures will get
serialized identically...?
On 01/19/2015 02:57 PM, Richard Brady wrote:
> Thanks guys, great answers.
>
> The design choice certainly makes a lot more sense now regardless of
> whether one agrees with it or not.
>
> Regards,
> Richard
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150119/c6c82c2c/attachment.html>;
Alan Reiner [ARCHIVE] /
npub1sm…mnq7h
2023-06-07 15:28:36
in reply to nevent1q…erw7
Author Public Key
npub1sm6zhjmk5scuz294jmpkw99wwwjzetjgwp4fu4gn6utqgdz87hkqamnq7hPublished at
2023-06-07 15:28:36Event JSON
{
"id": "0d3973e9b5601876f130cc62d5877a4bb2d75cfb6a56ecf99bc08592ce78fa8e",
"pubkey": "86f42bcb76a431c128b596c36714ae73a42cae48706a9e5513d716043447f5ec",
"created_at": 1686151716,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e1f7de9a3cc96853dcc43455df7f54523449e553ee4cde336d6870fe0e40792d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2b56cbf65d8e277e8a3f748462a591ed1561f1b4ff5e8babd07644c43920527b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"264cfbf38e2ed11fda0674057503cc28ef45593308e12623ce6fc2a7aaea77c1"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-01-19\n📝 Original message:I'm a bit confused. It's been a long time since I looked at protobuf\n(and will have to dig into it soon), but I seem to recall it doesn't\nhave any of the determinism properties you guys just said. It is\nintended to allow you to skip details of the on-the-wire representations\nand just send a bunch of named fields between systems. I thought there\nwas no guarantee that two identical protobuf structures will get\nserialized identically...?\n\n\n\n\nOn 01/19/2015 02:57 PM, Richard Brady wrote:\n\u003e Thanks guys, great answers. \n\u003e\n\u003e The design choice certainly makes a lot more sense now regardless of\n\u003e whether one agrees with it or not.\n\u003e\n\u003e Regards,\n\u003e Richard\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.\n\u003e GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.\n\u003e Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.\n\u003e Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.\n\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150119/c6c82c2c/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "80d992e675762e0b9b9d603fe1fe95dd3241fe04be30bcbed430b817f9d7e78a86b6ca34dedda36dc4056ccc3f6be5470205a63115b87ff1e9a16d1474be90de"
}