Event JSON
{
"id": "0d6fce64e339a7b58675700eb203c6e40997339b3e8b33724fbcb8c52ce0d692",
"pubkey": "b441a59dc33193f91d4f1692135169179c4eea2fbc3cc908bcaf4620528bb638",
"created_at": 1694676844,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"87f62342d87419765127028b4f21a52aafa2701bb9fd09b63cf2ca73826b398a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e5d95bd16369567fe8d60d89e7fe281d9ea378b33f57a224ffe94681ea713c71",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"026d8b7e7bcc2b417a84f10edb71b427fe76069905090b147b401a6cf60c3f27"
],
[
"t",
"hyperbitconization"
],
[
"t",
"hyperbitconization"
],
[
"t",
"stocks"
],
[
"t",
"stocks"
],
[
"t",
"Blackrock"
],
[
"t",
"blackrock"
],
[
"t",
"Bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
]
],
"content": "I had a interesting discussion about this yesterday. Cause we're in stocks as well.\nMain point is, that Stocks mostly are bound to the debt cycle and most of them are dedicated to do the growth game of more and more and more.\nBut\nTis doesn't fit to the philosophy of Bitcoin where we want limitation.\nThat means that in an #hyperbitconization scenario most of the #stocks would loose if they don't change business modell.\nMost of them will not.\n\nSo question is\nIs an All in BTC strategy the right way for the coming years till after Bitcoin took over?\nMaybe the #Blackrock nerds were still conservative with their calculation of 85% allocation of a portfolio to #Bitcoin.",
"sig": "8c448aeabb98a54d86f080434f808b49132e9ebc16e3f0b366f1a286c5c545558b6d6e562ce1e8e6cdb113eb5e251e335341d89510613714202ffff7585d8ebb"
}