Adrian Roselli on Nostr: To its credit, the “Accessibility Considerations” section appears to have ...
Published at
2025-05-23 00:12:22Event JSON
{
"id": "051dec9ee0a0817cc33f73866df45a3be8873f1b87271884896bf8aa938bf4ce",
"pubkey": "7e72a9e116902990cb1f9173e4bd7d1b65a86e0420cd97e82f540d2829413609",
"created_at": 1747959142,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"06cef41a9584234569f918ceb6030a949dc6fe6ce7eaaeeec3d49ca597fab141",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://toot.cafe/users/aardrian/statuses/114554250333252581",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
]
],
"content": "To its credit, the “Accessibility Considerations” section appears to have actually considered existing and potential accessibility concerns:\nhttps://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/CSSTooltipPseudo/explainer.md#accessibility-considerations\n\nAnother positive is that I don’t see the same names or org involved in this one (at least not as deeply) as that Google Chrome … thing.\n\nSo I’m saying there’s a chance!",
"sig": "8e0a0543466ceb5e6c61206da39bc5247f93e78d4212b797f7ac068dabe42b0092042dd29f120d7100e237ae5217847ff29f9fc0ede5118055e9eac8d09ab9ee"
}