Sarah Fackrell on Nostr: Top Brand v. Cozy Comfort - Court rules that because two patents owned by the maker ...
Published at
2023-10-11 13:03:55Event JSON
{
"id": "07e4be4672fda1ddb4a734078632609e15705fe70948bd1c728d83551ce75b11",
"pubkey": "9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"created_at": 1697029435,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"designpatents"
],
[
"t",
"wearableblankets"
],
[
"t",
"thecomfy"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/design_law/statuses/111216521090185284",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Top Brand v. Cozy Comfort - Court rules that because two patents owned by the maker of The Comfy were not entitled to the benefit of an earlier filing date, those patents were invalid based on The Comfy itself:\n\nhttps://www.scribd.com/document/676879213/Top-Brand-v-Cozy-Comfort-SJ-Order\n\n#DesignPatents #WearableBlankets #TheComfy\n\nhttps://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/216/510/443/893/464/original/e353c5fc47c07935.jpg",
"sig": "39c7fcdfd5e8ee5bf4948e0d4f7cf22388d19890cc738cf97471d0d722f2f7d043fe73c69cdc6f584ee6b132c756c5692e8b0f97c90038a127dcca62c0685e24"
}