š
Original date posted:2022-06-12
š Original message:Yes
Although I'm guessing most would agree that would be worse.
I certainly would choose to add fee generating features over inflation
Probably most other people would too
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022, 11:36 PM Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:02:18AM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > Maintaining the security of the protocol is squarely the responsibility
> of
> > the Bitcoin software and the core developers
> >
> > Continued demand for block space is critical for Bitcoin's security.
>
> Only because the block reward goes away. If it was made to continue
> indefinitely - most likely with an inflation hard fork - demand for block
> space
> would not be critical to Bitcoin's security.
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220612/b66df85b/attachment.html>;
Erik Aronesty [ARCHIVE] /
npub1y2ā¦5taj0
2023-06-07 23:10:04
in reply to nevent1qā¦7lgk
Author Public Key
npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0Published at
2023-06-07 23:10:04Event JSON
{
"id": "1129f3d21fa0a53c40fa973365b178e05be90c2ccdaa934f55790fa1a48aa72a",
"pubkey": "22944ce1e29904e3826d25013a614e4665693ec514003efacc1b7586e8e5d0aa",
"created_at": 1686179404,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5551b13e7da6b3f09c0d99802a19f9d792bb6230bb9f7b81382a9edb07abfa59",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"63062e3a1f54ce8cbc26aa66e604f8625a9d0a1f8d419a546600d6874a35fb1f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2022-06-12\nš Original message:Yes\n\n\nAlthough I'm guessing most would agree that would be worse.\n\nI certainly would choose to add fee generating features over inflation\n\nProbably most other people would too\n\n\n\nOn Sat, Jun 11, 2022, 11:36 PM Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:02:18AM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Maintaining the security of the protocol is squarely the responsibility\n\u003e of\n\u003e \u003e the Bitcoin software and the core developers\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Continued demand for block space is critical for Bitcoin's security.\n\u003e\n\u003e Only because the block reward goes away. If it was made to continue\n\u003e indefinitely - most likely with an inflation hard fork - demand for block\n\u003e space\n\u003e would not be critical to Bitcoin's security.\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220612/b66df85b/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "96530b541450b7d93ad1ae727b6a0799d73ed3372b48660b8d8ebc880452e876dd89074b4eef2965180e0316e44cb873b00b67fb6626d555552d96fb9e95ac1c"
}