📅 Original date posted:2014-06-25
📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Lawrence Nahum <lawrence at greenaddress.it>
wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Allow me to recap BIP changes in discussion:
>
> - making some changes to allow merchants to offer discounts in case of
> instant ?
> - allowing multiple signatures ?
>
> Did I miss anything? Thoughts on the above from others?
>
Jumping on this thread after reading it all. I am in favor of the
discount offered by the merchant.
Ideally the merchant could get the amount of the wallet *fee*
for instant payment (privacy leak?). That way, the merchant
could decide to support the instant payment at 100% (better
user experience after all) or at 50% only or at 0%.
This would encourage instant payment for merchants and buyers without
(re-)creating a non-transparent system.
regards,
--
sebastien requiem - bendingspoons.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140625/2e107dbe/attachment.html>;
sebastien requiem [ARCHIVE] /
npub1mf…zyzp7
2023-06-07 15:22:42
in reply to nevent1q…t4s8
Author Public Key
npub1mfzet54elwdrmqkzm5rjmddk52eftm4an0a5ssz7ccs453z3fdrqkzyzp7Published at
2023-06-07 15:22:42Event JSON
{
"id": "12075fdab18d5677f474ac084da4ad3acda6fe16fa404116c35aeb13a9f8a263",
"pubkey": "da4595d2b9fb9a3d82c2dd072db5b6a2b295eebd9bfb48405ec6215a44514b46",
"created_at": 1686151362,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ed0eede28e160c2ef8ddd5af1ee3069fdb0eb5f4c939c1c09a1a5f338c30c628",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e27b040bea7592a1e047060510ac25fc6c8a878befbc7b56312608bfb876ee9a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dce3e74d4fb3751e07a976b4d9e0d8c9189e3758c92528fa0b2d7a507e701bb2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-06-25\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Lawrence Nahum \u003clawrence at greenaddress.it\u003e\nwrote:\n\n\u003e [snip]\n\u003e\n\u003e Allow me to recap BIP changes in discussion:\n\u003e\n\u003e - making some changes to allow merchants to offer discounts in case of\n\u003e instant ?\n\u003e - allowing multiple signatures ?\n\u003e\n\u003e Did I miss anything? Thoughts on the above from others?\n\u003e\n\nJumping on this thread after reading it all. I am in favor of the\ndiscount offered by the merchant.\n\nIdeally the merchant could get the amount of the wallet *fee*\nfor instant payment (privacy leak?). That way, the merchant\ncould decide to support the instant payment at 100% (better\nuser experience after all) or at 50% only or at 0%.\n\nThis would encourage instant payment for merchants and buyers without\n(re-)creating a non-transparent system.\n\nregards,\n\n\n-- \nsebastien requiem - bendingspoons.com\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140625/2e107dbe/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "71b424d58d50008d72d8a1f225e7b0ee320654881acc9af9e836c083399c9eb9bb215ab5dba003815c9d3e15d9f2a4b13274d39d234e15d0c69777da3055d35a"
}