cmd on Nostr: Can someone sell me on why running an ecash mint is better than a vanilla custodial ...
Can someone sell me on why running an ecash mint is better than a vanilla custodial lightning service?
- Each ecash transaction must go through the mint to change hands, so the server can see everything and strongly correlate your payments anyway.
- You have to backup and store your coins or they are forever lost. The mint can backup your state, but that further strengthens the above.
- You have to use an ecash wallet instead of just a vanilla lightning wallet. A custodial wallet can have zero state, while an ecash wallet has to manage a lot of state. An ecash mint also has to bridge lightning payments if other users want to pay in lightning.
The plus side I guess is that the mint doesn't have to worry about strict accounting, while a custodial lightning server does. And there is some privacy benefits, but it's a complex subject and far from anonymous.
Please help me understand the use-case for ecash. I don't care about politics or the regulatory bogeyman, I just want to throw up a custodial wallet service that does its job with minimal friction. I want to have great user experience and ease of deployment (for others to fork my service).
Published at
2025-01-24 19:32:22Event JSON
{
"id": "131e60feb786617639db70142e582a6eb8677ac4199e1fcd713ec9b94d0d54bd",
"pubkey": "4229c21f0101abc3ba45233e176e975fa9e671bb18a6722bdf7726ba25445ff9",
"created_at": 1737747142,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Can someone sell me on why running an ecash mint is better than a vanilla custodial lightning service?\n\n- Each ecash transaction must go through the mint to change hands, so the server can see everything and strongly correlate your payments anyway.\n\n- You have to backup and store your coins or they are forever lost. The mint can backup your state, but that further strengthens the above.\n\n- You have to use an ecash wallet instead of just a vanilla lightning wallet. A custodial wallet can have zero state, while an ecash wallet has to manage a lot of state. An ecash mint also has to bridge lightning payments if other users want to pay in lightning.\n\nThe plus side I guess is that the mint doesn't have to worry about strict accounting, while a custodial lightning server does. And there is some privacy benefits, but it's a complex subject and far from anonymous.\n\nPlease help me understand the use-case for ecash. I don't care about politics or the regulatory bogeyman, I just want to throw up a custodial wallet service that does its job with minimal friction. I want to have great user experience and ease of deployment (for others to fork my service).",
"sig": "47854f8eaf8d7d4e82d7a456d0964fdc33749cc781e5b9ab7e6e5ac5cfc818b42033f93676c59a8a21348bb75b7378df29864745dafec91147ee31a461529bec"
}