Right, who is controlling this evil bastard handmaiden, what is she getting, who is paying her. The hypocrisy of her too! FUCKER 🤬 🚩 She's a monster.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/05/25/sturgeon-change-legal-definition-woman-trans-people/?msockid=2c2c6773bed367770f8e7284bf686658
Sturgeon: Legal definition of a woman may need to change Former SNP leader says trans people should be able to access female-only spaces if their lives become ‘almost impossible’
Nicola Sturgeon has argued the law on the definition of a woman may need to be changed to accommodate trans people after complaining that a Supreme Court ruling had been “massively over-interpreted”. The former first minister did not dispute that the court was correct that the definition of woman in the Equality Act 2010 was based on biological sex.
But she argued that this could be changed to give trans people access to female-only areas as it was for politicians “to decide what the law should be or has to be.” She said the “law has to change” if trans people’s lives become “almost impossible” and cited comments from Baroness Hale, the first female president of the Supreme Court. Lady Hale said last week that “there’s nothing in that judgment that says that you can’t have gender neutral loos” and Ms Sturgeon argued that this showed that the ruling had been “massively over-interpreted.”
The former SNP leader made the comments this weekend at the How the Light Gets In festival in Hay-on-Wye, Wales, adding that she had received “more misogynistic abuse as a result of this issue than any other”. Ms Sturgeon said this was “ironic” but pledged to “always” be an ally to trans people “no matter how difficult that might be.” Ms Sturgeon has previously claimed some opponents of the GRR Bill were transphobic. In January 2023, the month before she stepped down as first minister, she said: “You’ll also find that they’re deeply misogynist, often homophobic, possibly some of them racist as well.” Earlier this month she said she “fundamentally” disagreed that she should apologise for the Bill, saying FWS did not represent “every woman in the country.” The Sunday Times reported that Ms Sturgeon told the festival that “some of the immediate reaction” to the ruling had been over-interpreted.
https://archive.ph/Vv2FQ
HebrideanUltraTerfHecate /
npub1e3…kkndc
2025-05-25 14:39:59
Author Public Key
npub1e3xthy5u0hugnazmqwku5zzsljwv4cnjclyxzcrd65zflhu5238sakkndcSeen on
wss://relay.mostr.pubPublished at
2025-05-25 14:39:59Event JSON
{
"id": "17318582a656e84d1ce2045d22c0866926e4113a2ee2efbc28c629c385d16998",
"pubkey": "cc4cbb929c7df889f45b03adca0850fc9ccae272c7c861606dd5049fdf94544f",
"created_at": 1748183999,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://spinster.xyz/objects/8d2db6c7-0e25-4872-85cf-0d6fe07690c8",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
]
],
"content": "Right, who is controlling this evil bastard handmaiden, what is she getting, who is paying her. The hypocrisy of her too! FUCKER 🤬 🚩 She's a monster.\n\nhttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/05/25/sturgeon-change-legal-definition-woman-trans-people/?msockid=2c2c6773bed367770f8e7284bf686658\n\nSturgeon: Legal definition of a woman may need to change Former SNP leader says trans people should be able to access female-only spaces if their lives become ‘almost impossible’\n\nNicola Sturgeon has argued the law on the definition of a woman may need to be changed to accommodate trans people after complaining that a Supreme Court ruling had been “massively over-interpreted”. The former first minister did not dispute that the court was correct that the definition of woman in the Equality Act 2010 was based on biological sex.\n\nBut she argued that this could be changed to give trans people access to female-only areas as it was for politicians “to decide what the law should be or has to be.” She said the “law has to change” if trans people’s lives become “almost impossible” and cited comments from Baroness Hale, the first female president of the Supreme Court. Lady Hale said last week that “there’s nothing in that judgment that says that you can’t have gender neutral loos” and Ms Sturgeon argued that this showed that the ruling had been “massively over-interpreted.”\n\nThe former SNP leader made the comments this weekend at the How the Light Gets In festival in Hay-on-Wye, Wales, adding that she had received “more misogynistic abuse as a result of this issue than any other”. Ms Sturgeon said this was “ironic” but pledged to “always” be an ally to trans people “no matter how difficult that might be.” Ms Sturgeon has previously claimed some opponents of the GRR Bill were transphobic. In January 2023, the month before she stepped down as first minister, she said: “You’ll also find that they’re deeply misogynist, often homophobic, possibly some of them racist as well.” Earlier this month she said she “fundamentally” disagreed that she should apologise for the Bill, saying FWS did not represent “every woman in the country.” The Sunday Times reported that Ms Sturgeon told the festival that “some of the immediate reaction” to the ruling had been over-interpreted.\n\nhttps://archive.ph/Vv2FQ",
"sig": "45eb3029a1e47650259b8bf7ca11468d615ffd1228322cf1ea2148544b28487a47636245d2aa8cd3e643d6277d574d6f65d285a459a31cdcbe649248e8ba016b"
}