📅 Original date posted:2015-11-11
📝 Original message:Data compression adds latency and reduces predictability, so engineers have decided to leave compression to application layers instead of transport layer or lower in order to let the application designer decide what tradeoffs to make.
On Nov 11, 2015, at 10:49 AM, Marco Pontello via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> A random thought: aren't most communication over a data link already compressed, at some point?
> When I used a modem, we had the V.42bis protocol. Now, nearly all ADSL connections using PPPoE, surely are. And so on.
> I'm not sure another level of generic, data agnostic kind of compression will really give us some real-life practical advantage over that.
>
> Something that could take advantage of of special knowledge of the specific data, instead, would be an entirely different matter.
>
> Just my 2c.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151111/a0171c49/attachment.sig>;
Jonathan Toomim [ARCHIVE] /
npub1pl…yj0hj
2023-06-07 17:44:26
in reply to nevent1q…cl2q
Author Public Key
npub1pl6kcz00s7wgn6syh73dta0qm9sqpmtw4adv8rnm2w9fmynkw45sayj0hjPublished at
2023-06-07 17:44:26Event JSON
{
"id": "177d82a365b7829a9e3adb9f3864c3c9edefffbc3e94ca4a194eb1caf615e7fa",
"pubkey": "0ff56c09ef879c89ea04bfa2d5f5e0d96000ed6eaf5ac38e7b538a9d92767569",
"created_at": 1686159866,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"135d35eb642f6996f1dd35c63783ed01db4ec3c84bf3636c660d5a16e2852ec0",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"826502c522c1497024bd4194d7a37bb641cf0db16d5a4b991d90873bf6fd2c96",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5407287b78a2060becfadcd1d33e3ebc59ea39863ac2da5309beed2d37a80186"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-11-11\n📝 Original message:Data compression adds latency and reduces predictability, so engineers have decided to leave compression to application layers instead of transport layer or lower in order to let the application designer decide what tradeoffs to make.\n\nOn Nov 11, 2015, at 10:49 AM, Marco Pontello via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e A random thought: aren't most communication over a data link already compressed, at some point?\n\u003e When I used a modem, we had the V.42bis protocol. Now, nearly all ADSL connections using PPPoE, surely are. And so on.\n\u003e I'm not sure another level of generic, data agnostic kind of compression will really give us some real-life practical advantage over that.\n\u003e \n\u003e Something that could take advantage of of special knowledge of the specific data, instead, would be an entirely different matter.\n\u003e \n\u003e Just my 2c.\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 496 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151111/a0171c49/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "399559e1013a42bad1710fc8a2e3be1bdf16699ce61448840a0c66c42463d88a43a18dc98dd5ca25664199a6001de3ce0f7265e29bb3d08d58065bfb8ccd2536"
}