📅 Original date posted:2015-08-15
📝 Original message:> Baseless accusations also have no place on this mailing list. They are
> unprofessional, and poisonous to the consensus-building process we all
> seek to engage in.
I didn't see any baseless accusations in the message. I saw a
discussion of possible conflicts of interest. Your reply seems to
indicate that somehow conflicts of interest don't exist with the
developers or that the developers are somehow above everyone else. The
fact is the developers on this list discuss conflicts of interest all
the time as it relates to things like mining. Conflicts of interest are
going to be a regular part of Bitcoin development so you should start
getting used it because it is only going to increase as the value increases.
It is your messages attacking people who raise legitimate issues that is
poisonous. It tries to prevent discussions of the risks associated with
the code development. It creates an atmosphere where people are
blackballed if they discuss these issues. This is what happens in
religions all the time and it is time to start treating Bitcoin like the
technology that it is rather than some cult religion.
For all I know is that a hard fork controversy is going to cause the
price to drop temporarily so for all I know this is a scheme to buy some
cheap coins just like when hackers used to attack exchanges and
bitcointalk at the same time to get the price to drop. (I don't think
it is a scheme to do that but such a scheme is certainly possible in the
future and things like that should be expected to happen).
Russ
Milly Bitcoin [ARCHIVE] /
npub1rv…hc5wt
2023-06-07 15:47:12
in reply to nevent1q…dqh3
Author Public Key
npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wtSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 15:47:12Event JSON
{
"id": "17605f09b592ea7e6868a62530737e301d1fe9358f6c070a477b1b816f13582e",
"pubkey": "1b29d94ee81e1ee0479f1db4bc4ac887407bd470a0d7060e76f8ab27fdd57e50",
"created_at": 1686152832,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2f056596a73ada2819a3c6ed27fbcf1ad864d42a414ea6b10e00c7c860550529",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ea0f50108f28f73a13deaad46386de15a045ed9a091fed56deca70f2be3a4aaf",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1c3fbcf7160299f7584bcc5141e1512e9e0b1a7888d2df5d889e6a1f8a9c6a49"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-15\n📝 Original message:\u003e Baseless accusations also have no place on this mailing list. They are\n\u003e unprofessional, and poisonous to the consensus-building process we all\n\u003e seek to engage in.\n\nI didn't see any baseless accusations in the message. I saw a \ndiscussion of possible conflicts of interest. Your reply seems to \nindicate that somehow conflicts of interest don't exist with the \ndevelopers or that the developers are somehow above everyone else. The \nfact is the developers on this list discuss conflicts of interest all \nthe time as it relates to things like mining. Conflicts of interest are \ngoing to be a regular part of Bitcoin development so you should start \ngetting used it because it is only going to increase as the value increases.\n\nIt is your messages attacking people who raise legitimate issues that is \npoisonous. It tries to prevent discussions of the risks associated with \nthe code development. It creates an atmosphere where people are \nblackballed if they discuss these issues. This is what happens in \nreligions all the time and it is time to start treating Bitcoin like the \ntechnology that it is rather than some cult religion.\n\nFor all I know is that a hard fork controversy is going to cause the \nprice to drop temporarily so for all I know this is a scheme to buy some \ncheap coins just like when hackers used to attack exchanges and \nbitcointalk at the same time to get the price to drop. (I don't think \nit is a scheme to do that but such a scheme is certainly possible in the \nfuture and things like that should be expected to happen).\n\nRuss",
"sig": "7670d1bb97c9fb0f71c94cd219d29ec8fef05f7e2a42464cd14c9733794bbd6126664c20b1ab6c268cf6fe1025f8e32cf0fb1d5a69b24ded28bab9941d013074"
}