vinney on Nostr: It always fucks with me that the most concrete and reliable concepts (logic, math, ...
It always fucks with me that the most concrete and reliable concepts (logic, math, laws of physics etc.) are the "least real". Makes me skeptical of what we understand the term "real" to mean.
sure, they're not "physical", but they're real. gravity might not be "physical" but it is real and even observable, in a fashion.
Published at
2025-04-12 12:25:18Event JSON
{
"id": "160ee239b6f2c6cf3e592ae6c13eb910614aa4ca9ce6abeeb4cebaeb8e696d15",
"pubkey": "2efaa715bbb46dd5be6b7da8d7700266d11674b913b8178addb5c2e63d987331",
"created_at": 1744460718,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"07e5389d33bf9b76071fc1ecb79114045ad33de69c0ae77b468b23ae8e31d340",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"7ed7d5c3abf06fa1c00f71f879856769f46ac92354c129b3ed5562506927e200"
]
],
"content": "It always fucks with me that the most concrete and reliable concepts (logic, math, laws of physics etc.) are the \"least real\". Makes me skeptical of what we understand the term \"real\" to mean. \n\nsure, they're not \"physical\", but they're real. gravity might not be \"physical\" but it is real and even observable, in a fashion. ",
"sig": "41084e2e87a4f85afe0300ecd625a3a85d512048d01349b0fc018904ed49d30072e0db7a74f92091f3faebbc8ae81d7f472dd79a3a6d3664af9658ce15051380"
}
