📅 Original date posted:2013-11-15
📝 Original message:On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:53:16PM -0500, Alan Reiner wrote:
> I really like the XBT idea. It makes a lot of sense to match the ISO
I really don't. Just use the SI prefixes.
> currency symbol (though the ISO guys will have to adjust the way they've
> defined the "XBT"). And I do agree that going right to uBTC and
> skipping mBTC makes sense, too.
The display units should be choosable by the user.
> I'd prefer them not be called "micro bitcoins." I really want to call
> them "microbes" ... but I'm not sure that has the right flavor for money
Why on earth?
> transfer :) "Please give me 872 microbes". Perhaps we just call them
> "bits." Or even "micros" or "microbits". As I write this, I realize
> there's probably 872 threads on the forums about this already...
>
> But we would want to promote a consistent term, to avoid further
> confusion when people use different names for the new unit. It's not
> guaranteed to be successful, but if we pick a good name, and build it
> into the interface on the first release pushing the new unit, we have a
> chance to make the transition even easier.
The reason SI prefixes were invented is exactly to preven that case.
Eugen Leitl [ARCHIVE] /
npub1u7…ym47x
2023-06-07 15:09:40
in reply to nevent1q…5h7k
Author Public Key
npub1u770f582qk4l6eagyv9jd2x7wqujlu9ckfka7ru9sgjqtxhlzq9s4ym47xPublished at
2023-06-07 15:09:40Event JSON
{
"id": "1e65badffdc33fce393d71cec32907c9bd4bd45c359634657acc3c5165237344",
"pubkey": "e7bcf4d0ea05abfd67a8230b26a8de70392ff0b8b26ddf0f858224059aff100b",
"created_at": 1686150580,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f949fa80b2178db0fa7c7377159ffdf8cd87cc4a75383c5243367fef9a888c57",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"616de01551013269bc6852188e43d7d7afb119f842106782b202e611b7a7dcc6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-11-15\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:53:16PM -0500, Alan Reiner wrote:\n\u003e I really like the XBT idea. It makes a lot of sense to match the ISO\n\nI really don't. Just use the SI prefixes.\n\n\u003e currency symbol (though the ISO guys will have to adjust the way they've\n\u003e defined the \"XBT\"). And I do agree that going right to uBTC and\n\u003e skipping mBTC makes sense, too.\n\nThe display units should be choosable by the user. \n \n\u003e I'd prefer them not be called \"micro bitcoins.\" I really want to call\n\u003e them \"microbes\" ... but I'm not sure that has the right flavor for money\n\nWhy on earth?\n\n\u003e transfer :) \"Please give me 872 microbes\". Perhaps we just call them\n\u003e \"bits.\" Or even \"micros\" or \"microbits\". As I write this, I realize\n\u003e there's probably 872 threads on the forums about this already...\n\u003e \n\u003e But we would want to promote a consistent term, to avoid further\n\u003e confusion when people use different names for the new unit. It's not\n\u003e guaranteed to be successful, but if we pick a good name, and build it\n\u003e into the interface on the first release pushing the new unit, we have a\n\u003e chance to make the transition even easier.\n\nThe reason SI prefixes were invented is exactly to preven that case.",
"sig": "a320c91066a0e5d0ce0b90dbe3bbe90e8c67207eadf57e5959fdad3755480918e9ecea2087914e8a818a0979d4d50b5893131d77706d297e72cc7ef10b54aa40"
}