Wendell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-07-16 📝 Original message:I for one would be ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-07-16
📝 Original message:I for one would be interested in taking a look at that.
In San Jose I was asking around about the possibility of hiring someone to complete such a patch. Pieter Wuille introduced me to Eric Lombrozo, who expressed interest, but has since gotten quite busy. So we haven't arrived at a detailed estimate of what it would involve.
Maybe it would be better to start a completely new thread for this topic, but I would very much be interested in an open dissection of what adding SPV support to bitcoind would take. I am willing to fund or (ideally) co-fund this endeavor, if I can ever get my head around it. I'm super interested in all of these possibilities (including micro-stripped-VMs and transpilation), but would simply like to encourage the proliferation of _options_ whenever possible.
-wendell
grabhive.com | twitter.com/grabhive
On Jul 16, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> If you wanted to implement SPV mode in bitcoind, Gavin or I could send you Satoshi's old patch although of course it is no longer usable. It would indicate the basic cut lines though.
Published at
2023-06-07 15:04:39Event JSON
{
"id": "15c6753cfc76c60ca7b24c545e7937413fa64ebc96133ac8f95792e31efdb3cf",
"pubkey": "c534bb535ca1eba460ab96ad869cfa2160259b441c95515f281c187f0130f4f3",
"created_at": 1686150279,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"805c9b337acd60a9e8557279abc27f0c8810d1d58205cdd8a4a841df4604db50",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9d1df352fa94f62f5ad3c1437f6bc2bd8f1c591e222f359dcaec1db263022cbb",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-07-16\n📝 Original message:I for one would be interested in taking a look at that.\n\nIn San Jose I was asking around about the possibility of hiring someone to complete such a patch. Pieter Wuille introduced me to Eric Lombrozo, who expressed interest, but has since gotten quite busy. So we haven't arrived at a detailed estimate of what it would involve.\n\nMaybe it would be better to start a completely new thread for this topic, but I would very much be interested in an open dissection of what adding SPV support to bitcoind would take. I am willing to fund or (ideally) co-fund this endeavor, if I can ever get my head around it. I'm super interested in all of these possibilities (including micro-stripped-VMs and transpilation), but would simply like to encourage the proliferation of _options_ whenever possible.\n\n-wendell\n\ngrabhive.com | twitter.com/grabhive\n\nOn Jul 16, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:\n\n\u003e If you wanted to implement SPV mode in bitcoind, Gavin or I could send you Satoshi's old patch although of course it is no longer usable. It would indicate the basic cut lines though.",
"sig": "196e5dfe8fe0916e5b39d4f5a450c2faf1896b168864cbf6efbc7aac518eca4378f4d7b0b32f9308f062e12d01ea5ef614f0a43c15d6bc264b7b51e59f51279f"
}