📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19
📝 Original message:On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Joseph Poon <joseph at lightning.network> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:21:36AM -0700, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> If anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge Tim??n <
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I repeated my nit on https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179
>
> I am also indifferent, but also dislike technical debt.
>
> It should maybe be noted for those who wish to do/write-code-for mempool
> transaction selection (irrespective of one's opinion on it) that lower
> is better, since transactions with shorter relative locks are
> transactions with "higher priority".
That policy code should be simple to change, but thank you for pointing it out.
Also thank you for declaring your position (indifference) on the subject.
Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx…cl2d8
2023-06-07 17:34:58
in reply to nevent1q…xp4a
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 17:34:58Event JSON
{
"id": "11fa810026bd28e6a1b786d51b124af81a8ae4bf9f2fc999d2b097309efb39f8",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686159298,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"41b744fb00dece0ad755afb2bd169d7e5d2189a91240037a08b3b215596a998e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f0f823b8b33f014be79a0562dfb393c1199f28b6ffb262843ee2edec34b15f06",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ccb4cc87c455b74febaee5929cfd0726421b2eea64ad2b16440b68e8c7433211"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Joseph Poon \u003cjoseph at lightning.network\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:21:36AM -0700, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\u003e If anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge Tim??n \u003c\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e \u003e I repeated my nit on https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179\n\u003e\n\u003e I am also indifferent, but also dislike technical debt.\n\u003e\n\u003e It should maybe be noted for those who wish to do/write-code-for mempool\n\u003e transaction selection (irrespective of one's opinion on it) that lower\n\u003e is better, since transactions with shorter relative locks are\n\u003e transactions with \"higher priority\".\n\nThat policy code should be simple to change, but thank you for pointing it out.\nAlso thank you for declaring your position (indifference) on the subject.",
"sig": "2ac9c98c08f801647cee59076ae492439ba40e262bf011d89ed6e741e80f7548ea88e975f857fffd76ac9010726964083356cdc64deb662dff4e368dc0dcb79e"
}