📅 Original date posted:2020-07-03
📝 Original message:On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:17 PM ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In fact, one rule of thumb might be that wherever watchtowers are
> required, a timelocked bribe might be possible.
>
> I think a better heuristic is that, if the logic of the construction
> assumes "transaction with earlier locktime supersedes transaction with
> later locktime", then it is timelocked-bribery-vulnerable.
>
That's true by definition. Timelocked bribes are, well, going to be
possible when there are timelocks. I was going more for an "indirect clue"
that wherever a watchtower is proposed, a timelocked bribe is possible.
This is entirely a pedantic point :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20200703/13a76f16/attachment.html>;
Tejaswi Nadahalli [ARCHIVE] /
npub12f…e5846
2023-06-07 18:25:48
in reply to nevent1q…jamw
Author Public Key
npub12f7kf5f49m65w3dxpdsu80pdg96uyzmnjv4sw5r409luknwusmsshe5846Published at
2023-06-07 18:25:48Event JSON
{
"id": "103a25edbc6515f3658042823cc574275f0ec0a1ce94d307e7eb36047b4ae522",
"pubkey": "527d64d1352ef54745a60b61c3bc2d4175c20b73932b075075797fcb4ddc86e1",
"created_at": 1686162348,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"52a5bc3bbb1affebce6627133c56389e56d7b12c0cac790634907fb4fb814e5d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3eebcc4833f3ddbe224c4cae0dbca52dc6bc459ee77ff51fbb0ee56d519f8fad",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4505072744a9d3e490af9262bfe38e6ee5338a77177b565b6b37730b63a7b861"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2020-07-03\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:17 PM ZmnSCPxj \u003cZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e In fact, one rule of thumb might be that wherever watchtowers are\n\u003e required, a timelocked bribe might be possible.\n\u003e\n\u003e I think a better heuristic is that, if the logic of the construction\n\u003e assumes \"transaction with earlier locktime supersedes transaction with\n\u003e later locktime\", then it is timelocked-bribery-vulnerable.\n\u003e\n\nThat's true by definition. Timelocked bribes are, well, going to be\npossible when there are timelocks. I was going more for an \"indirect clue\"\nthat wherever a watchtower is proposed, a timelocked bribe is possible.\nThis is entirely a pedantic point :-)\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20200703/13a76f16/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "e2de1c32c39951edb514883d2a8a5a8b779a672d6ebfabb1a37965135b7d5815abc64d90c8dadea776b7d52f951a6a59c4119557d32cca7f460f1efa114a877a"
}