📅 Original date posted:2021-04-08
📝 Original message:Probably worth noting, but while the coin toss was acceptable to many people as "who cares, just move on", the two
authors of actual code for the two proposals here also came to an agreement on a way forward, so its not like it was a
"coin toss to overrule everyone on 'the other side'".
On 4/8/21 10:30, Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 12:40:42PM +0100, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>
>> All of this makes me extremely uncomfortable and I dread to think what
>> individuals and businesses all over the world who have plans to
>> utilize and build on Taproot are making of all of this. As an
>> individual I would like to distance myself from this circus. I will
>> try to keep the mailing list informed though of further developments
>> re Speedy Trial in Core or progress on an alternative client.
>>
>
> Thank you for your updates.
>
>
> For what it's worth, as somebody who wants to use Taproot I don't care *at
> all* about activation parameters, and I especially don't care about block
> height vs MTP.
>
> If a coin toss is what it takes for people to move past this that's fine
> by me.
>
>
>
>
Matt Corallo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1e4…jxmcu
2023-06-07 22:51:32
in reply to nevent1q…j6px
Author Public Key
npub1e46n428mcyfwznl7nlsf6d3s7rhlwm9x3cmkuqzt3emmdpadmkaqqjxmcuPublished at
2023-06-07 22:51:32Event JSON
{
"id": "104ed632f2f2cfbb22b3a7e03f12ede94f2fca18d781b802facd49c328b4522f",
"pubkey": "cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba",
"created_at": 1686178292,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e977dde9360620d8ccf85527584b1a688f9094c7606fe0e598671f5f03c2d5d6",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"4bdce357f47ea66083b469e4f4535d38fa62a2aaebcc23bca7375c9373441079",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ee55eb03423bd4db01d5c92ad434d52c602d9da1de37ed37cc5bf7d2a13a4cab"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2021-04-08\n📝 Original message:Probably worth noting, but while the coin toss was acceptable to many people as \"who cares, just move on\", the two \nauthors of actual code for the two proposals here also came to an agreement on a way forward, so its not like it was a \n\"coin toss to overrule everyone on 'the other side'\".\n\nOn 4/8/21 10:30, Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 12:40:42PM +0100, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e All of this makes me extremely uncomfortable and I dread to think what\n\u003e\u003e individuals and businesses all over the world who have plans to\n\u003e\u003e utilize and build on Taproot are making of all of this. As an\n\u003e\u003e individual I would like to distance myself from this circus. I will\n\u003e\u003e try to keep the mailing list informed though of further developments\n\u003e\u003e re Speedy Trial in Core or progress on an alternative client.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e \n\u003e Thank you for your updates.\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e For what it's worth, as somebody who wants to use Taproot I don't care *at\n\u003e all* about activation parameters, and I especially don't care about block\n\u003e height vs MTP.\n\u003e \n\u003e If a coin toss is what it takes for people to move past this that's fine\n\u003e by me.\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e",
"sig": "6f8daa5f87bbc2231202a91531712c9c546c3376173082816c094c6412678c869d32dc05a72d80056d84ca270920318188d2eaf53fd635e388b0f5e11d549d8d"
}