I wanted to get some discussion going on a proposed NIP I’m drafting. Does it make sense for clients to display a “REVOKED” status for compromised keys? This would be similar to NIP-05 verification but as a new .revoked file domain owners can host that contains known compromised keys and identities. I’d love to hear some thoughts and feedback.
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/184
Ron Stoner
npub1qj…dz44v
2023-01-24 04:26:31
Author Public Key
npub1qjtnsj6hks7pq7nh3pcyv2gpha5wp6zc8vew9qt9vd2rcpvhsjjqydz44vPublished at
2023-01-24 04:26:31Event JSON
{
"id": "105e42fe42caf0394f991df734ceb3957262bae7868d078d6fc002bd131d6592",
"pubkey": "0497384b57b43c107a778870462901bf68e0e8583b32e2816563543c059784a4",
"created_at": 1674534391,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "I wanted to get some discussion going on a proposed NIP I’m drafting. Does it make sense for clients to display a “REVOKED” status for compromised keys? This would be similar to NIP-05 verification but as a new .revoked file domain owners can host that contains known compromised keys and identities. I’d love to hear some thoughts and feedback.\n\nhttps://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/184",
"sig": "6085280da2b6175d7d4768b4346b0938a500e1a25e1ee9e9467cb97025853e95699c7c3613c9e39575f188188aec8ee37a4f7b2d14ef1c427843343c4e18c5c0"
}