what do you think if relays add their tor hidden service address to their nip-11 document?
Vitor Pamplona (nprofile…pyug) would you support it on amethyst if we add it on immortal implementation? also, currently we are supporting a new field called default limit based on: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1821 which you can support it since i can see amethyst have the most complete information document ui.
k.
npub1h4…z9kay
2025-03-11 18:54:16
Author Public Key
npub1h49w8en79xty6j2pwgnpm3znjhyf767jua6xgt3kvyn3w80ms86s2z9kayPublished at
2025-03-11 18:54:16Event JSON
{
"id": "10cf2ed18274663e26b2163727181e5723409fc49d7c73703689923486393615",
"pubkey": "bd4ae3e67e29964d494172261dc45395c89f6bd2e774642e366127171dfb81f5",
"created_at": 1741719256,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"r",
"https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1821"
]
],
"content": "what do you think if relays add their tor hidden service address to their nip-11 document?\n\nnostr:nprofile1qqsyvrp9u6p0mfur9dfdru3d853tx9mdjuhkphxuxgfwmryja7zsvhqpzamhxue69uhhv6t5daezumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6tcpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcscpyug would you support it on amethyst if we add it on immortal implementation? also, currently we are supporting a new field called default limit based on: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1821 which you can support it since i can see amethyst have the most complete information document ui. ",
"sig": "a90c8d6d5fb2ed702fdfe4c79d8101180eb9af9dc404a02aeab165a15d216ebbd9c8438fa04b7cbdb0a3d6f7f485d3bf11825b77afbb1eaefae8f1bdfcabc8f7"
}