š
Original date posted:2022-09-15
š Original message:On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 6:03 PM Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 2:47 AM Buck O Perley via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> First just wanted to thank you
> for taking the initiative to
> > put this together. I think that as the community and
> > ecosystem continue to grow, it's going to be an important
> > part of the process to have groups like this develop. Hopefully
> > they allow us to resist the "Tyranny of Structurelessness" without
> > resorting to formalized governance processes and systems.
>
> Huh, lots of reading material behind that phrase. I'd heard it
> before, but hadn't looked it up.
>
> > > Defining a communication channel is still an open question: IRC, Slack,
> > Discord, Discourse, ...
> >
> > I would vote against Slack. IRC is probably the best but maybe too
> > high a barrier to entry? Publishing logs at least would counter
> > concerns of it being exclusive. Maybe discord as an alternative.
>
> I found Discord immediately wanted a phone number from me. I think
> IRC remains the lowest bar for participants to contribute.
>
>
Agreed, anything that requires a phone number makes it difficult to be
pseudonymous.
I recommend Matrix, since it doesn't require any privacy invasive
information and has e2ee by default for 1-1 conversations.
The Matrix room could optionally bridge to IRC if there is a significant
demand for that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220915/2f70be72/attachment.html>;
Devrandom [ARCHIVE] /
npub1j0ā¦w9k8n
2023-06-07 23:13:23
in reply to nevent1qā¦43qw
Author Public Key
npub1j0js72tmnxzmrtd6j0j5wcvfuhsqwgqxdwkpmw28rmmuy22y3wzsdw9k8nPublished at
2023-06-07 23:13:23Event JSON
{
"id": "1fb0106c7afdc183ebbedf855b81b2c810e217d10ff01a1c8dd1044abf8d3aa0",
"pubkey": "93e50f297b9985b1adba93e5476189e5e00720066bac1db9471ef7c229448b85",
"created_at": 1686179603,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e35298f3a454cb998688d0eb2bc6a4febabc3626fd1f28ccedf66cdab4b6d1df",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3219cbf4aee0e3d1820dbb179f6a519b98d6a32c8bb90cf51efee29409bad8a9",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"2f55bf03677afdb15d004a39383afba6220aa6c059cafa7b8827b87934d3c254"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2022-09-15\nš Original message:On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 6:03 PM Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 2:47 AM Buck O Perley via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e First just wanted to thank you\n\u003e for taking the initiative to\n\u003e \u003e put this together. I think that as the community and\n\u003e \u003e ecosystem continue to grow, it's going to be an important\n\u003e \u003e part of the process to have groups like this develop. Hopefully\n\u003e \u003e they allow us to resist the \"Tyranny of Structurelessness\" without\n\u003e \u003e resorting to formalized governance processes and systems.\n\u003e\n\u003e Huh, lots of reading material behind that phrase. I'd heard it\n\u003e before, but hadn't looked it up.\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e \u003e Defining a communication channel is still an open question: IRC, Slack,\n\u003e \u003e Discord, Discourse, ...\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e I would vote against Slack. IRC is probably the best but maybe too\n\u003e \u003e high a barrier to entry? Publishing logs at least would counter\n\u003e \u003e concerns of it being exclusive. Maybe discord as an alternative.\n\u003e\n\u003e I found Discord immediately wanted a phone number from me. I think\n\u003e IRC remains the lowest bar for participants to contribute.\n\u003e\n\u003e\nAgreed, anything that requires a phone number makes it difficult to be\npseudonymous.\n\nI recommend Matrix, since it doesn't require any privacy invasive\ninformation and has e2ee by default for 1-1 conversations.\n\nThe Matrix room could optionally bridge to IRC if there is a significant\ndemand for that.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220915/2f70be72/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "c5500665a4341ed793043aace8f38780e06d3ce69d1fbff1cd20688e5594db4f3e7bd1474a478f3b2b34f7a99b7bb3dbf813d3fc24a59d93f20f38c287a762bc"
}