i get the rhetoric, but it makes a category error. “broken money, fixing the money” assumes a utilitarian framework. it makes sense if u approach the situation as primarily economic, but that’s wrong. morality drives the economics, in my book, i lay out why the money isn’t broken, it’s working all too well.
are shackles “broken” because they bind you? nah
we are naive if we attribute ignorance to our bondage
hylomorphic / Neal
npub18z…zlyv6
2025-02-09 19:03:22
in reply to nevent1q…cx75
Author Public Key
npub18zsu6xlfpwdgnrfyzhwpq80ssu83tdew5g7dkzkl4tavsrgzl5yslzlyv6Published at
2025-02-09 19:03:22Event JSON
{
"id": "1fed696b9e5229e8822e65a0745f997d007b2110707caa2e6f212101d25f6059",
"pubkey": "38a1cd1be90b9a898d2415dc101df0870f15b72ea23cdb0adfaafac80d02fd09",
"created_at": 1739127802,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9aeba2b313e356f24ac6c91cb5d87373d405e9e7b0ba5f5d9dc52613b525a694",
"wss://nostr.oxtr.dev",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"f9c8838736f5a0b611ed2c458a8ae7a480802e4ec38e52e96483986ca44ce612"
]
],
"content": "i get the rhetoric, but it makes a category error. “broken money, fixing the money” assumes a utilitarian framework. it makes sense if u approach the situation as primarily economic, but that’s wrong. morality drives the economics, in my book, i lay out why the money isn’t broken, it’s working all too well.\n\nare shackles “broken” because they bind you? nah \n\nwe are naive if we attribute ignorance to our bondage ",
"sig": "4bcf2c1df67fb057616481e36d8a2f54dfd22e6569cd67e316e73aae2872464db37433a794f3790b1d71c2495b332337217c6b6997419772e29758cc928c8485"
}