📅 Original date posted:2016-01-20
📝 Original message:Hi all!
As planned, this is the three month review[1]: discussion of how
moderation should change is encouraged in this thread.
First, thanks to everyone for the restraint shown in sending
(and responding to!) inflammatory or sand-in-the-gears mails, and being
tolerant with our mistakes and variances in moderation.
The only changes we made to the plan so far:
1) We've stopped clearing the "needs mod" bit after first posts, and
2) Trivially answerable emails or proposals have been answered in the
reject message itself.
You can see almost all (there was some lossage) rejects at:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev-moderation/
So, what should moderation look like from now on?
- Stop moderating altogether?
- Moderate <topic> more/less harshly?
- Use a different method/criteria for moderation?
- Add/remove moderators?
- Other improvements?
Thanks,
Rusty.
[1] http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-October/011591.html
Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1zw…hkhpx
2023-06-07 17:48:02
in reply to nevent1q…s6s2
Author Public Key
npub1zw7cc8z78v6s3grujfvcv3ckpvg6kr0w7nz9yzvwyglyg0qu5sjsqhkhpxPublished at
2023-06-07 17:48:02Event JSON
{
"id": "1feca7fcb061f860d51ae7e33522367527c6c2392113de85d4236adf7d6a9ff8",
"pubkey": "13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425",
"created_at": 1686160082,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"443784c79bd2b729932644d0165b92b4b5b6ff7c95c51041a6be521aa013a639",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-01-20\n📝 Original message:Hi all!\n\n As planned, this is the three month review[1]: discussion of how\nmoderation should change is encouraged in this thread.\n\n First, thanks to everyone for the restraint shown in sending\n(and responding to!) inflammatory or sand-in-the-gears mails, and being\ntolerant with our mistakes and variances in moderation.\n\nThe only changes we made to the plan so far:\n1) We've stopped clearing the \"needs mod\" bit after first posts, and\n2) Trivially answerable emails or proposals have been answered in the\n reject message itself.\n\nYou can see almost all (there was some lossage) rejects at:\n https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev-moderation/\n\nSo, what should moderation look like from now on?\n- Stop moderating altogether?\n- Moderate \u003ctopic\u003e more/less harshly?\n- Use a different method/criteria for moderation?\n- Add/remove moderators?\n- Other improvements?\n\nThanks,\nRusty.\n[1] http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-October/011591.html",
"sig": "c34c1d2f469cc9f5c5632e1593d6feb85f48b1c6d00e54080dd3c8da562026795750ecf5e38b822ca1fba900c4c391e787c858709ffa593aca553e643ca17f0b"
}