📅 Original date posted:2016-01-21
📝 Original message:xor--- via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:20:46 AM Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> So, what should moderation look like from now on?
>
> The original mail which announced moderation contains this rule:
>> - Generally discouraged: [...], +1s, [...]
>
> I assume "+1s" means statements such as "I agree with doing X".
>
> Any sane procedure of deciding something includes asking the involved people
> whether they're for or against it.
> If there are dozens of proposals on how to solve a particular technical
> problem, how else do you want to decide it than having a vote?
+1s here means simpling say "+1" or "me too" that carries no additional
information. ie. if you like an idea, that's great, but it's not worth
interruping the entire list for.
If you say "I prefer proposal X over Y because <reasons>" that's
different. As is "I dislike X because <reasons>" or "I need X because
<reasons>".
Hope that clarifies!
Rusty.
Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1zw…hkhpx
2023-06-07 17:48:03
in reply to nevent1q…cu76
Author Public Key
npub1zw7cc8z78v6s3grujfvcv3ckpvg6kr0w7nz9yzvwyglyg0qu5sjsqhkhpxPublished at
2023-06-07 17:48:03Event JSON
{
"id": "1ffd13779856df2d0d789775d9593c60dcd0a6f4d651d23384a77c8923a346f6",
"pubkey": "13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425",
"created_at": 1686160083,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"443784c79bd2b729932644d0165b92b4b5b6ff7c95c51041a6be521aa013a639",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"21bae354715d64846b4f4d1d6075411346b1ec7b1b8b7e47c7c214aa3df30a89",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-01-21\n📝 Original message:xor--- via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e writes:\n\u003e On Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:20:46 AM Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\u003e So, what should moderation look like from now on?\n\u003e\n\u003e The original mail which announced moderation contains this rule:\n\u003e\u003e - Generally discouraged: [...], +1s, [...]\n\u003e\n\u003e I assume \"+1s\" means statements such as \"I agree with doing X\".\n\u003e\n\u003e Any sane procedure of deciding something includes asking the involved people \n\u003e whether they're for or against it.\n\u003e If there are dozens of proposals on how to solve a particular technical \n\u003e problem, how else do you want to decide it than having a vote?\n\n+1s here means simpling say \"+1\" or \"me too\" that carries no additional\ninformation. ie. if you like an idea, that's great, but it's not worth\ninterruping the entire list for.\n\nIf you say \"I prefer proposal X over Y because \u003creasons\u003e\" that's\ndifferent. As is \"I dislike X because \u003creasons\u003e\" or \"I need X because\n\u003creasons\u003e\".\n\nHope that clarifies!\nRusty.",
"sig": "e39aae07c105527b14172d534362b9d43290273007430b81a14aba452a556b951de64ab860cfdfd0f3e199404fd04ba770926fa53560d62ffeb5d916e16d3278"
}