📅 Original date posted:2015-03-25
📝 Original message:On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Tom Harding <tomh at thinlink.com> wrote:
> The idea of limited-lifetime addresses was discussed on 2014-07-15 in
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bitcoin.devel/5837
>
> It appears that a limited-lifetime address, such as the fanciful
>
> address = 4HB5ld0FzFVj8ALj6mfBsbifRoD4miY36v_349366
Assuming the sender is not an uncooperative idiot, you can simply
include expiration information and the sender can refuse to send after
that time.
If the sender is an uncooperative idiot, they can always change your
target and send anyways.
This would seem to work nearly as well as the non-reorg safe network
impacting version, and yet has no cost beyond the extra size is
communicating the limit.
> Block containing tx invalid if a prior confirmed tx has paid address
Requires a unprunable verification state.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 15:32:12
in reply to nevent1q…735j
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:32:12Event JSON
{
"id": "1b642d0eb5e8f81aed88d956f56c151b23dfbd8fe43ee454e8ddf8e6db8fb2b7",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686151932,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"13ba2dac7eec5154e8f99682c168a8cede79e5ef5e0b1fe726762657ed73749d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a29cdd08a4365dc6dc680a69097ca7fed9a9ef8adfe1dbd7f09d423087ed91da",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f00d0858b09287e941ccbc491567cc70bdbc62d714628b167c1b76e7fef04d91"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-03-25\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Tom Harding \u003ctomh at thinlink.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e The idea of limited-lifetime addresses was discussed on 2014-07-15 in\n\u003e\n\u003e http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bitcoin.devel/5837\n\u003e\n\u003e It appears that a limited-lifetime address, such as the fanciful\n\u003e\n\u003e address = 4HB5ld0FzFVj8ALj6mfBsbifRoD4miY36v_349366\n\nAssuming the sender is not an uncooperative idiot, you can simply\ninclude expiration information and the sender can refuse to send after\nthat time.\n\nIf the sender is an uncooperative idiot, they can always change your\ntarget and send anyways.\n\nThis would seem to work nearly as well as the non-reorg safe network\nimpacting version, and yet has no cost beyond the extra size is\ncommunicating the limit.\n\n\u003e Block containing tx invalid if a prior confirmed tx has paid address\n\nRequires a unprunable verification state.",
"sig": "55d3b84a32c7de9d3f19b048716372d1380991ab6c491cf9113d297d72f36f70d831cbddf26c67c989b54d2e5509108b753f823e7499b5628754a555c5cab4fe"
}