📅 Original date posted:2014-03-01
📝 Original message:On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:26:57 -0800, Wladimir <laanwj at gmail.com> wrote:
> Such a thing would be interesting for a future BIP standard. I see one
> problem here: for an unsigned payment request there isn't really an
> "origin". >Browser URI handlers don't send the referrer either.
Yeah, good point. If you have a cert, we have the CN from the cert, which
becomes the string displayed as 'Pay To' and alternatively 'Merchant'.
But if there's no cert then all you have is memo.
So the best way to differentiate signed requests is by prominently
displaying that Merchant string. Really the green part should just be the
'Pay To' line, the rest is content. If it showed a BLANK 'Pay To' that
would make the lack of certificate highly apparent.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140228/4ceb93c0/attachment.html>;
Jeremy Spilman [ARCHIVE] /
npub10e…jc727
2023-06-07 15:14:06
in reply to nevent1q…kdtw
Author Public Key
npub10etkvm8l0jr0jsgdx02dxnhnu5g989dnca90guj5rklwkaplnh3sgjc727Published at
2023-06-07 15:14:06Event JSON
{
"id": "19527ececf3476aa4741b26531091f461893796f6c09f72abc12060a014a1aea",
"pubkey": "7e57666cff7c86f9410d33d4d34ef3e5105395b3c74af472541dbeeb743f9de3",
"created_at": 1686150846,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9e5166865ea533e5be06a6a9b8186c1848240f9dd657628bef4a313ebd83313b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f46406fddc50af142177329ca127b9e6b9bbfb8d0a073f7cf2beb7aab43f36d1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"30217b018a47b99ed4c20399b44b02f70ec4f58ed77a2814a563fa28322ef722"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-03-01\n📝 Original message:On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:26:57 -0800, Wladimir \u003claanwj at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Such a thing would be interesting for a future BIP standard. I see one \n\u003e problem here: for an unsigned payment request there isn't really an \n\u003e \"origin\". \u003eBrowser URI handlers don't send the referrer either.\n\nYeah, good point. If you have a cert, we have the CN from the cert, which \nbecomes the string displayed as 'Pay To' and alternatively 'Merchant'.\n\nBut if there's no cert then all you have is memo.\n\nSo the best way to differentiate signed requests is by prominently \ndisplaying that Merchant string. Really the green part should just be the \n'Pay To' line, the rest is content. If it showed a BLANK 'Pay To' that \nwould make the lack of certificate highly apparent.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140228/4ceb93c0/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "f1dd775df18686fc2e8032b546db41928a4c9b55dedbd1284cfba8cd0246c0888d73412782d8a79973808138ccedebfc81e6f6c764eb2da7cca68edba4642842"
}