nostrilandia on Nostr: In a recent interview, #[0] mentioned nostr as great, but that it doesn’t solve ...
In a recent interview,
saylor (npub15dq…lm5m) mentioned nostr as great, but that it doesn’t solve the bot problem (think unlimited impersonation bots spamming the network).
He’s talked about it before, but an orange check that involves proof of work.
Paid relays are a step in that direction, but will we end up centralizing around just a few paid relays?
I’m not suggestion an orange check, just wondering what others thoughts are as the protocol grows and gains more traction.
Published at
2023-05-22 15:49:08Event JSON
{
"id": "1b936cfb966b2cccf43812f95bd7ce595cd04c98ef19e339bdab899fc6797c98",
"pubkey": "ca4ef0d885f25c5b1aa6d424f591b1b7a7d37af1cf58eaaa21a6e0d584e65287",
"created_at": 1684770548,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"a341f45ff9758f570a21b000c17d4e53a3a497c8397f26c0e6d61e5acffc7a98"
]
],
"content": "In a recent interview, #[0] mentioned nostr as great, but that it doesn’t solve the bot problem (think unlimited impersonation bots spamming the network).\n\nHe’s talked about it before, but an orange check that involves proof of work.\n\nPaid relays are a step in that direction, but will we end up centralizing around just a few paid relays?\n\nI’m not suggestion an orange check, just wondering what others thoughts are as the protocol grows and gains more traction.",
"sig": "d962c7a46fd8194eed8c24203ef0475941ebfc7b90919fe657e5f769678fcc1ed1079587851fa653695b3c0e16cb5cf59351aef14ba5e6efce6e89f2dc0a8fd8"
}