emilygorcenski on Nostr: npub1ufmln…gqhp4 the way it works is like this, consider tennessee for instance. A ...
npub1ufmlneg8tt9jwvk6p40t02lxhmkns6zlpu4cwrvxerczdnn4syzqlgqhp4 (npub1ufm…qhp4) the way it works is like this, consider tennessee for instance.
A year ago, nobody had ever tried to ban drag, so courts have never ruled on whether drag is free speech or not.
The law passed attempting to outlaw drag. That's bad!
But the Trump appointed judge looked at it and said, naw, this is blatantly unconstitutional. He then ruled that drag is protected.
That means that, at least in that district, drag is explicitly protected by precedent.
Published at
2023-06-08 12:56:56Event JSON
{
"id": "16e9eb8ce53599db07786391cde4d46fcea5a1f8643963edb9850dfb63d51c5c",
"pubkey": "60e314b99ef45ea2e296f0ab25522011640af41f6d7d3ae3d1a74fed9a58c147",
"created_at": 1686229016,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e277f9e5075acb2732da0d5eb7abe6beed38685f0f2b870d86c8f026ce758104",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"d183780b26c261c46404d339c2524481e2abb631caac0058694a12cf6aec60e4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"0edd6469e244cea6812a7175317251000840abacbf8ebf440dcff302e3bc640e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://indieweb.social/users/emilygorcenski/statuses/110508704818542257"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1ufmlneg8tt9jwvk6p40t02lxhmkns6zlpu4cwrvxerczdnn4syzqlgqhp4 the way it works is like this, consider tennessee for instance.\n\nA year ago, nobody had ever tried to ban drag, so courts have never ruled on whether drag is free speech or not.\n\nThe law passed attempting to outlaw drag. That's bad!\n\nBut the Trump appointed judge looked at it and said, naw, this is blatantly unconstitutional. He then ruled that drag is protected.\n\nThat means that, at least in that district, drag is explicitly protected by precedent.",
"sig": "7484cca330e3cc86f3cca99690ea833e6310c1958aa943f6d553613fb96d7aaa758c7ef1eb967980daab3db347fc117fe26a0adde4286f4ec5178d4b8c0916a1"
}