📅 Original date posted:2018-12-04
📝 Original message:
Which brings us back to the initial proposal that just signals the
awareness of a temporary underpayment with the single "more is coming"-bit.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 11:49 PM Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com> writes:
> > But what if 2 of those paths fail?
> > It would be better to merge them into a single payment along the
> expensive 4th path.
> > However, the remaining succeeding path has already given `numpaths`=3.
> >
> > Using `numpaths` overcommits to what you will do in the future, and is
> unnecessary anyway.
> > The payee is interested in the total value, not the details of the split.
>
> Excellent point.
>
> Thanks,
> Rusty.
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20181204/de818531/attachment-0001.html>;
Christian Decker [ARCHIVE] /
npub1wt…gtuyn
2023-06-09 12:53:18
in reply to nevent1q…c4pl
Author Public Key
npub1wtx5qvewc7pd6znlvwktq03mdld05mv3h5dkzfwd3dc30gdmsptsugtuynPublished at
2023-06-09 12:53:18Event JSON
{
"id": "128cee85dcd3041a6c7968d0eae0c0d2f83464f438f3f5457c13f302606956d1",
"pubkey": "72cd40332ec782dd0a7f63acb03e3b6fdafa6d91bd1b6125cd8b7117a1bb8057",
"created_at": 1686315198,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"81dd654a3c913b3d217aa09caea262a1e74ccc8f0664724e746c47c96c07b0c5",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"da3e16e7591c01c1dc90ed6fdedb0b6aff95c2dcf780dec2ecb9ae93af996596",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-12-04\n📝 Original message:\nWhich brings us back to the initial proposal that just signals the\nawareness of a temporary underpayment with the single \"more is coming\"-bit.\n\nOn Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 11:49 PM Rusty Russell \u003crusty at rustcorp.com.au\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e ZmnSCPxj \u003cZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com\u003e writes:\n\u003e \u003e But what if 2 of those paths fail?\n\u003e \u003e It would be better to merge them into a single payment along the\n\u003e expensive 4th path.\n\u003e \u003e However, the remaining succeeding path has already given `numpaths`=3.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Using `numpaths` overcommits to what you will do in the future, and is\n\u003e unnecessary anyway.\n\u003e \u003e The payee is interested in the total value, not the details of the split.\n\u003e\n\u003e Excellent point.\n\u003e\n\u003e Thanks,\n\u003e Rusty.\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Lightning-dev mailing list\n\u003e Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20181204/de818531/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "4dc07e87b629f5410d0f198d95d9e7f5cc060d1b1e863684ce871cefeeaf38a2d45cd7a378539fde76edf7cb1cac0a6c2acf02eba13890edce8a434f20f4c8d9"
}