š
Original date posted:2015-07-23
š Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 23 July 2015 06:21:55 GMT-04:00, Kalle Rosenbaum via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>Hi all
>
>I suggest that we add to the "BIP Editor Responsibilities & Workflow"
>section of BIP0001 that if the BIP editor for some reason won't handle
>the BIP within a week, he/she should notify the author within that
>same week with an estimate on when it will be handled.
>
>Maybe we could extend it to two weeks instead, the important thing is
>that the author knows what to expect.
>
>I'm trying to get BIP numbers allocated for Proof of Payment. I have
>requested it from the BIP editor Gregory Maxwell with CC this list. I
>also emailed Gregory in private about it. So far I have not seen any
>reaction to my requests.
To be clear, where is an implementation of your proposed BIP?
The philosophy of the process - particularly for non-consensus BIPs - is running code, preferably in production. An actual number for the standard that code implements isn't a barrier to that process.
Remember that it's convenient for all if the number of BIPs out there isn't significantly higher than the number of actual standards in place that are being used.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJVsUBy
AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lnc47AIAI11FdNBCFr9TybCvxKS32Idk4aZ4fveJ6ucHZx1PWPl
lzoz/CJBZGolWF9jWnpyiCnNxl64MjflNxi62ZD+VS4SEl0uHcYXdqXsNQzk9OoK
bZFXHJ57jZlHCwpwiLM72EWN6AZG/XZZFXisNRAvoYqryHdb5dDmVok0wPH87qOH
PBTlspyaKH4/OFDpslCdoDTLHcMxlasiyqNdC5NxC7eB1WpEtyGbOd1twvNeNH00
1opJNuajiUm1vJEhMS67a9DhfnYf9/3TDRtkc0lrYfF3r1n2aVtyzlPcJANX/cWa
7L9HtC4WpVLqny0AiTs5dK6DxPIUy/u2Q9yFZ2oL6dM=
=RW4h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2ā¦a2np2
2023-06-07 15:43:16
in reply to nevent1qā¦j9vu
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 15:43:16Event JSON
{
"id": "12fcc7dd847d26de1013c519afdfedc032eaa92e9260b6a6000e8e3c78280136",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686152596,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d9d182c2246b23ebc50a79903bd6572205a64e01a41e39699ccb078878ea006a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"bb410266553d7d9814de548e2a6894d0c7d8f36f506c35b1131b147d88181198",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e39d9ce3b0ed9cbb17528b25bb4b33bcee465476e44ea5980fb6f2693b97ab95"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-07-23\nš Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA256\n\n\n\nOn 23 July 2015 06:21:55 GMT-04:00, Kalle Rosenbaum via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003eHi all\n\u003e\n\u003eI suggest that we add to the \"BIP Editor Responsibilities \u0026 Workflow\"\n\u003esection of BIP0001 that if the BIP editor for some reason won't handle\n\u003ethe BIP within a week, he/she should notify the author within that\n\u003esame week with an estimate on when it will be handled.\n\u003e\n\u003eMaybe we could extend it to two weeks instead, the important thing is\n\u003ethat the author knows what to expect.\n\u003e\n\u003eI'm trying to get BIP numbers allocated for Proof of Payment. I have\n\u003erequested it from the BIP editor Gregory Maxwell with CC this list. I\n\u003ealso emailed Gregory in private about it. So far I have not seen any\n\u003ereaction to my requests.\n\nTo be clear, where is an implementation of your proposed BIP?\n\nThe philosophy of the process - particularly for non-consensus BIPs - is running code, preferably in production. An actual number for the standard that code implements isn't a barrier to that process.\n\nRemember that it's convenient for all if the number of BIPs out there isn't significantly higher than the number of actual standards in place that are being used.\n\n\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n\niQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJVsUBy\nAAoJEMCF8hzn9Lnc47AIAI11FdNBCFr9TybCvxKS32Idk4aZ4fveJ6ucHZx1PWPl\nlzoz/CJBZGolWF9jWnpyiCnNxl64MjflNxi62ZD+VS4SEl0uHcYXdqXsNQzk9OoK\nbZFXHJ57jZlHCwpwiLM72EWN6AZG/XZZFXisNRAvoYqryHdb5dDmVok0wPH87qOH\nPBTlspyaKH4/OFDpslCdoDTLHcMxlasiyqNdC5NxC7eB1WpEtyGbOd1twvNeNH00\n1opJNuajiUm1vJEhMS67a9DhfnYf9/3TDRtkc0lrYfF3r1n2aVtyzlPcJANX/cWa\n7L9HtC4WpVLqny0AiTs5dK6DxPIUy/u2Q9yFZ2oL6dM=\n=RW4h\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----",
"sig": "8de0e278a36a77ee4c1fe3edd7a8fd5c4a45a56a04d11d2680ac742d81e83d64b7b8aa192f6a880d1c1c57ef016c66367e8ebfb96e3281393e50f6c14065fcd7"
}