📅 Original date posted:2015-06-16
📝 Original message:Thank you for the clarification Tom!
/Kalle
2015-06-16 16:05 GMT+02:00 Tom Harding <tomh at thinlink.com>:
> On 6/16/2015 5:12 AM, Kalle Rosenbaum wrote:
>> 2015-06-16 7:26 GMT+02:00 Tom Harding <tomh at thinlink.com>:
>>> Kalle goes to some trouble to describe how merchants need to ensure that
>>> they only accept a PoP provided as a response to their challenge.
>>>
>> Do you mean that it will be hard to explain to merchants that they
>> must check the nonce in the PoP so that it matches the nonce in the
>> pop request?
>
> Sorry for the idiomatic language. No, I just meant that you have
> thought it out in detail! You standardize a latent capability of the
> cryptosystem. It seems very powerful for some classes of users.
>
>
Kalle Rosenbaum [ARCHIVE] /
npub1uw…55zf7
2023-06-07 15:36:58
in reply to nevent1q…8s8s
Author Public Key
npub1uwweecasakwtk96j3vjmkjenhnhyv4rku382txq0kmexjwuh4w2st55zf7Published at
2023-06-07 15:36:58Event JSON
{
"id": "12ebe48faee2880b3232c4e69e68414fd582a6161437cc884f46b76e2265f214",
"pubkey": "e39d9ce3b0ed9cbb17528b25bb4b33bcee465476e44ea5980fb6f2693b97ab95",
"created_at": 1686152218,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e1766602ba0f6768319a1583d11fb84dd1782fa79b735d969ef1342e648fd1da",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3919d6af2e660c2b0e4cdfffeeac78d43d3c7822b5f688001b0409851258478c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dc329a02c970aabf03b87185ef51c86afe4586fe3a148508af898af3fabc56a3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-16\n📝 Original message:Thank you for the clarification Tom!\n\n/Kalle\n\n2015-06-16 16:05 GMT+02:00 Tom Harding \u003ctomh at thinlink.com\u003e:\n\u003e On 6/16/2015 5:12 AM, Kalle Rosenbaum wrote:\n\u003e\u003e 2015-06-16 7:26 GMT+02:00 Tom Harding \u003ctomh at thinlink.com\u003e:\n\u003e\u003e\u003e Kalle goes to some trouble to describe how merchants need to ensure that\n\u003e\u003e\u003e they only accept a PoP provided as a response to their challenge.\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Do you mean that it will be hard to explain to merchants that they\n\u003e\u003e must check the nonce in the PoP so that it matches the nonce in the\n\u003e\u003e pop request?\n\u003e\n\u003e Sorry for the idiomatic language. No, I just meant that you have\n\u003e thought it out in detail! You standardize a latent capability of the\n\u003e cryptosystem. It seems very powerful for some classes of users.\n\u003e\n\u003e",
"sig": "8aeb14850843b980a749b53503d3d50f662fb51bd1662e9ab020a7d7225f5dfbb7902785df99128efd45d7dc803a865a2c65fa6c77bd279349bd4527ad81b826"
}