The problem is, if a prosecution is malicious, its legal allegation is not the true qualm that the court has with the defendant.
The problem with your point of saying, essentially, any reason for prosecuting someone is covered by the ruling, is that it's not supported by what you cited. Can you find another section of the #SCOTUS ruling that says #POTUS can have someone prosecuted for any reason other than genuinely believing that the law was broken?
realcaseyrollins ✝️ /
npub19g…cx4p4
2024-07-09 02:07:53
in reply to nevent1q…ydvh
Author Public Key
npub19gvf2pju7j66w8t34gvhhyr0du708llt9u9ns0605xy8vhs2a22qlcx4p4Published at
2024-07-09 02:07:53Event JSON
{
"id": "1d7fef27c2265165510f6ad42c9978d92f45900e4f3467f49a13f567ba29a64c",
"pubkey": "2a1895065cf4b5a71d71aa197b906f6f3cf3ffeb2f0b383f4fa188765e0aea94",
"created_at": 1720490873,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0b559338f0ce1d268dfce72aff80876d32740aac068d4ce3c18c77fab13f8094",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"t",
"potus"
],
[
"e",
"d49d4a51f29ddd7b7a6c0bf9b976c0cbbbd9b33c448eeebce6e23d39ae87196a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"a856d220a92a9449ad661808e334bfb5e230e9d049c21572bb8a11f4fc951c37"
],
[
"p",
"f3ac4d5a9430e81c43754953bcd4db9defe68e218bcf0db440faa7d6b70fb940"
],
[
"p",
"d47ea77b264de373fd40ed02e3a492f45df5f92d3415af78cbabc37283411acd"
],
[
"p",
"a47f0fbd67b7b88f76d06d544b0df5bbc600c938274b0ab6a59f6e19e8c9957e"
],
[
"p",
"e98bb6b76cd12e46e8bb4c9efba02c5133cde99904ef1507252fdeb6bb339dd9"
],
[
"p",
"2a1895065cf4b5a71d71aa197b906f6f3cf3ffeb2f0b383f4fa188765e0aea94"
],
[
"t",
"scotus"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://social.teci.world/objects/fb769cc9-f1ea-4053-9dca-4f792191e587",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://social.teci.world/objects/fb769cc9-f1ea-4053-9dca-4f792191e587",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"expiration",
"1723082876"
]
],
"content": "The problem is, if a prosecution is malicious, its legal allegation is not the true qualm that the court has with the defendant.\n\nThe problem with your point of saying, essentially, any reason for prosecuting someone is covered by the ruling, is that it's not supported by what you cited. Can you find another section of the #SCOTUS ruling that says #POTUS can have someone prosecuted for any reason other than genuinely believing that the law was broken?",
"sig": "a0621fe1ac5ca851bae679b598d62ef1b0347f69dbf5f544cb08db1d376d8295219725f498413741ef4aff8ba75310b99c42ae31be0ce6885aa768e402db8744"
}