It'd be one thing if SCOTUS said, "we don't think that was an insurrection," but odds are good they eschew being that clear—which would put political heat on them—and instead absolve Trump with some hideous monstrosity of confabulated interpretation that further erodes constitutional law itself.
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=141757
Max Kennerly /
npub1s2…82uhq
2024-03-03 23:43:48
Author Public Key
npub1s2d2ake9ax0yr40447fc9rrqgvk2mv8fv3t6tz6mz3kmsuxs3w7s682uhqPublished at
2024-03-03 23:43:48Event JSON
{
"id": "1d7fc2265788096277d1cb912b901501d8ee48864599c75354487625302325f8",
"pubkey": "829aaedb25e99e41d5f5af93828c60432cadb0e96457a58b5b146db870d08bbd",
"created_at": 1709509428,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mstdn.social/users/maxkennerly/statuses/112034409937373660",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "It'd be one thing if SCOTUS said, \"we don't think that was an insurrection,\" but odds are good they eschew being that clear—which would put political heat on them—and instead absolve Trump with some hideous monstrosity of confabulated interpretation that further erodes constitutional law itself.\nhttps://electionlawblog.org/?p=141757",
"sig": "95c3437d8a3f2e9bbbba71ea0ac0083dc1cdd88f22de9f95f77c32ca71bcd3952bfc110a26b7def5093359718ab6ee682ad7249da97f735fcc45821bbb571cea"
}