📅 Original date posted:2013-10-21
📝 Original message:The list comes from BIP 1.
On 2013-10-21, at 12:03 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:
> On 21/10/13 08:52, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:
>> How about putting them into sub directories that map onto the status of the BIP?
>>
>> Reading BIP 1, that would make:
>>
>> Accepted
>> Active
>> Draft
>> Deferred
>> Final
>> Rejected
>> Replaced
>> Withdrawn
>
> Have it been considered to do this via IETF? The process there is hardened by 40 years of experience and 7000+ RFCs. Probably better than anything you can devise yourself.
>
> Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131021/bce168ec/attachment.sig>;
Jean-Paul Kogelman [ARCHIVE] /
npub1sa…8y304
2023-06-07 15:07:40
in reply to nevent1q…qwl9
Author Public Key
npub1sa86gng3pvs3jgyt5majwcrhn8ck5qxgy9pjqxkh79u638cd7dys28y304Published at
2023-06-07 15:07:40Event JSON
{
"id": "1d23dd1c041987695930cc8caab149b006186a476506fa3838d2c136627858bc",
"pubkey": "874fa44d110b2119208ba6fb27607799f16a00c82143201ad7f179a89f0df349",
"created_at": 1686150460,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d7c1869dab2bd34b6e5ae79cda5d73bda811a1af3e65276521fa77a929d2819d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9002bb027f379961ea8b0ba5f573d342a87969d65c413cd29784e0b9cd187c3f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-10-21\n📝 Original message:The list comes from BIP 1.\n\nOn 2013-10-21, at 12:03 AM, Martin Sustrik \u003csustrik at 250bpm.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On 21/10/13 08:52, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:\n\u003e\u003e How about putting them into sub directories that map onto the status of the BIP?\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Reading BIP 1, that would make:\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Accepted\n\u003e\u003e Active\n\u003e\u003e Draft\n\u003e\u003e Deferred\n\u003e\u003e Final\n\u003e\u003e Rejected\n\u003e\u003e Replaced\n\u003e\u003e Withdrawn\n\u003e \n\u003e Have it been considered to do this via IETF? The process there is hardened by 40 years of experience and 7000+ RFCs. Probably better than anything you can devise yourself.\n\u003e \n\u003e Martin\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 842 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131021/bce168ec/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "4d5f8c26d7b45c78db2a9932f38c8783d07af3d0691563f50ace8f8102e321809bf7c4f04f8de7bf3cc3b1cb6f2c8403d0931a1e200abd5890ec132673378ee3"
}