Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-05-19 📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-05-19
📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 19 May 2014 20:20:40 CEST, Justus Ranvier <justusranvier at gmail.com> wrote:
>You and Gavin could do a lot better by working on a Bitcoin social
>contract - a promise of what features will *never* be added (or taken
>away) from Bitcoin, because despite what you say it's not acceptable
>to propose anything at all.
>
>Maybe start with things like how the Bitcoin protocol will never be
>changed to allow for confiscation of funds, regardless of who might
>demand such a feature.
Might be worth looking into the recent RFC 7258: Pervasive Monitoring Is an Attack for some guidance on how to write such a social contract.
Re: Gavin, note the language in the foundation bylaws:
Section 2.2 The Corporation shall promote and protect both the decentralized, distributed and private nature of the Bitcoin distributed-digital currency and transaction system as well as individual choice, participation and financial privacy when using such systems.
You might want to do a pull-req to add fungibility and rejection of blacklists to that list; note Adam Back's comments on how fungibility and privacy are inherently linked.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.1.1
iQFQBAEBCAA6BQJTek/ZMxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8
cGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhYPIB/9/mhDOei8uMGHmzK41
YdL2ezs4LMPLyCRbo9Eu7MDJAMBaMH4VUbomR0tJVPRS191ifa2F/xGYnbDvk/PG
rLX86uPPMBxZqnVMgZLeKJkUHm3Zlkm1Ti58bMR8VVQuPazBBpkYtsvk+0+8j9su
ke7Xq+OqUGOC03bM4bxtKyBCy1FrCJuFgZEywKhOjr6boANLctDRBZerPqQ4AcjP
tHSAAImcesMhjc/N9LJ4MeygszzblYpdsQeiw8jvvyZI7vCSHuKb+hur+kCszYjD
ygfY9QmoNye2yc0GLZd+kXSMwY6gLIvaAFhv2ElMTMiJ7btHtJJfyEaA9Ub4zEEY
JKeO
=DSjZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Published at
2023-06-07 15:21:38Event JSON
{
"id": "1d54ea5572ebaa4c0a04f4b784165109bcfb6d97174b318bad018652506ff471",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686151298,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d30b28e456bef274130eabcfd37469931101e35cbb7eae21abca740750812e9b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b6c4a2a6aea04dbc7db363c650e641c44ea544efa0ad52fc5a2257cc6dd54978",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b2b39b6f2c86908d3da9f500193abd5757b21cac328f838800a48c4d557c10dd"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-05-19\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA256\n\n\n\nOn 19 May 2014 20:20:40 CEST, Justus Ranvier \u003cjustusranvier at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003eYou and Gavin could do a lot better by working on a Bitcoin social\n\u003econtract - a promise of what features will *never* be added (or taken\n\u003eaway) from Bitcoin, because despite what you say it's not acceptable\n\u003eto propose anything at all.\n\u003e\n\u003eMaybe start with things like how the Bitcoin protocol will never be\n\u003echanged to allow for confiscation of funds, regardless of who might\n\u003edemand such a feature.\n\nMight be worth looking into the recent RFC 7258: Pervasive Monitoring Is an Attack for some guidance on how to write such a social contract.\n\nRe: Gavin, note the language in the foundation bylaws:\n\nSection 2.2 The Corporation shall promote and protect both the decentralized, distributed and private nature of the Bitcoin distributed-digital currency and transaction system as well as individual choice, participation and financial privacy when using such systems.\n\nYou might want to do a pull-req to add fungibility and rejection of blacklists to that list; note Adam Back's comments on how fungibility and privacy are inherently linked.\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: APG v1.1.1\n\niQFQBAEBCAA6BQJTek/ZMxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8\ncGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhYPIB/9/mhDOei8uMGHmzK41\nYdL2ezs4LMPLyCRbo9Eu7MDJAMBaMH4VUbomR0tJVPRS191ifa2F/xGYnbDvk/PG\nrLX86uPPMBxZqnVMgZLeKJkUHm3Zlkm1Ti58bMR8VVQuPazBBpkYtsvk+0+8j9su\nke7Xq+OqUGOC03bM4bxtKyBCy1FrCJuFgZEywKhOjr6boANLctDRBZerPqQ4AcjP\ntHSAAImcesMhjc/N9LJ4MeygszzblYpdsQeiw8jvvyZI7vCSHuKb+hur+kCszYjD\nygfY9QmoNye2yc0GLZd+kXSMwY6gLIvaAFhv2ElMTMiJ7btHtJJfyEaA9Ub4zEEY\nJKeO\n=DSjZ\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----",
"sig": "149f1a830adf9bec698bdf8d904473e36056964af40010cd7b4bd3fcf8f86039ae8547552f83a4897e690a6d94fbf9b1b7768fa300ca834cca203cec93797adc"
}