📅 Original date posted:2013-08-07
📝 Original message:Very brief comment on BIP 72:
I wonder if there should be some discussion included in the
specification as to how the BIP 21 amount, message and label
parameters should be processed when the payment protocol is used.
Presumably amount should be completely ignored? But is the total
amount requestd by the PaymentRequest required to match the amount
parameter (when present)? Is the client permitted to complain if they
don't?
And what about message? Presumably the memo from PaymentDetails
should take precedence, but if it's not present, and message is?
I think this is an area perhaps more suited to SHOULDs and MAYs rather
than MUSTs, but it is probably worthy of mention...
roy
Roy Badami [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tr…0f95j
2023-06-07 15:05:38
in reply to nevent1q…qulw
Author Public Key
npub1trckpcxmceskq4cykxgwxm63n8ugrjrpu5mk83c90e4upsf7d9gqf0f95jPublished at
2023-06-07 15:05:38Event JSON
{
"id": "17b00f9cac95d1f1b859ee0667304e7593d3b9c3f2ea5aac8b79405c83f7c991",
"pubkey": "58f160e0dbc661605704b190e36f5199f881c861e53763c7057e6bc0c13e6950",
"created_at": 1686150338,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c5e56f29f73ae037803d4c07616ae2b1311014baf62f54f10973c0b1b685df68",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"470aeaba88d3b521062ee03b56ec05b43c31043f21b65d276d16d5b7d9abddef",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"131b929bd24fea3b51a119fe477e84f8bdc25398d7b881798bf8339d8bf2656b"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-08-07\n📝 Original message:Very brief comment on BIP 72:\n\nI wonder if there should be some discussion included in the\nspecification as to how the BIP 21 amount, message and label\nparameters should be processed when the payment protocol is used.\n\nPresumably amount should be completely ignored? But is the total\namount requestd by the PaymentRequest required to match the amount\nparameter (when present)? Is the client permitted to complain if they\ndon't?\n\nAnd what about message? Presumably the memo from PaymentDetails\nshould take precedence, but if it's not present, and message is?\n\nI think this is an area perhaps more suited to SHOULDs and MAYs rather\nthan MUSTs, but it is probably worthy of mention...\n\nroy",
"sig": "d6791c86214f03faa06f29e639d901afea04622e88e214f9a75b82e0c07bc66016831300631b6ff511d2035b86247dff8bcc7b4baaed4db9f898ad153bfb54f2"
}