š
Original date posted:2015-08-21
š Original message:On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:01:06AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I don't see any link to data backing up "Bloom filter usage has declined
> significantly"
>
> Is there actual data showing this feature's use is declining or
> non-existent?
I run a number of high speed nodes and while I don't have historical
logs handy over time, I've noticed a drop from about %5-%10 SPV clients
at any one time to closer to %1 (Matt: you have a few TB of logs saved
don't you?)
Also, as I mentioned, just look at the popularity of wallets such as
Mycelium that are not adopting bloom filters, but going with SPV
verification of block headers w/ lookup servers.
Anyway, look at the analogous implementation of NODE_GETUTXO's, which
helpfully has provided the infrastructure for wallets that need bloom
filters to find appropriate nodes to connect too - we certainely aren't
seeing any shortages of nodes for those wallets to use.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/d339991b/attachment-0001.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2ā¦a2np2
2023-06-07 17:37:37
in reply to nevent1qā¦6n50
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Seen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 17:37:37Event JSON
{
"id": "811b3160abefbf22f8500227015bc0d6efdb48efcfd6c39296a9463e388378c5",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686159457,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"24b0a1bf3dfc9fc9f3f6739b5fab50dd1ce2799fc8ef26378cae8652e75e5fc8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d38fda512d68e46b3fc3a61f19fd9c5e23ddea8d54c795d045815fb6fa1a889e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-08-21\nš Original message:On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:01:06AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e I don't see any link to data backing up \"Bloom filter usage has declined\n\u003e significantly\"\n\u003e \n\u003e Is there actual data showing this feature's use is declining or\n\u003e non-existent?\n\nI run a number of high speed nodes and while I don't have historical\nlogs handy over time, I've noticed a drop from about %5-%10 SPV clients\nat any one time to closer to %1 (Matt: you have a few TB of logs saved\ndon't you?)\n\nAlso, as I mentioned, just look at the popularity of wallets such as\nMycelium that are not adopting bloom filters, but going with SPV\nverification of block headers w/ lookup servers.\n\nAnyway, look at the analogous implementation of NODE_GETUTXO's, which\nhelpfully has provided the infrastructure for wallets that need bloom\nfilters to find appropriate nodes to connect too - we certainely aren't\nseeing any shortages of nodes for those wallets to use.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/d339991b/attachment-0001.sig\u003e",
"sig": "6cd4a7bcac2292e20ef40deecf66c5206b654e8a4ce9fae8e00e5ec7c24073f0cacbe2853a9be519f2b90ebe396f3c2c9c44e2e9fb8865da5ce9f2b9d5f26050"
}