📅 Original date posted:2016-08-18
📝 Original message:On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> > I have some experience with hardware wallet development and its
> > integration and I know it's a mess. But it is too early to define such
> > rigid standards yet. Also, TREZOR concept (device as a server and the
> > primary source of workflow management) goes directly against your
> > proposal of wallet software as an workflow manager. So it is clear NACK
> > for me.
>
> The current question – as already mentioned – is we ACK to work together
> on a signing protocol or if we NACK this before we even have started.
>
ACK for Ledger. What's necessary to sign a transaction is well known, I
don't see how driving any hardware wallet from the wallet itself or from a
third party daemon implementing that URL scheme would make any difference,
other than providing better devices interoperability, as well as easier
maintenance and update paths for the wallets.
--
Nicolas Bacca | CTO, Ledger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160818/cac3d457/attachment.html>;
Nicolas Bacca [ARCHIVE] /
npub1u3…242vg
2023-06-07 17:52:52
in reply to nevent1q…hsu0
Author Public Key
npub1u34qfktxn8e82kug8965jep22sksvu4txjt4lrn2znys6d7napqqg242vgPublished at
2023-06-07 17:52:52Event JSON
{
"id": "8138d225cba9ca8460607352e66b5984cfe2aa0a8f4d338f0080a56dff95d0c5",
"pubkey": "e46a04d96699f2755b88397549642a542d0672ab34975f8e6a14c90d37d3e840",
"created_at": 1686160372,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6e7f7cb2c3110cb7289a3abd667304a3b4e6f9ba4e2581c492d7b93c214a5ea1",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b79de27670bc73398024ef3a4ee8f5dc65317c9293d2a3e41d7f3999fb31dc7f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9a463e0fab8963b013698c15a0f2449d19c97f3b88458e5874095b5006df9a0c"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-08-18\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Hi\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e I have some experience with hardware wallet development and its\n\u003e \u003e integration and I know it's a mess. But it is too early to define such\n\u003e \u003e rigid standards yet. Also, TREZOR concept (device as a server and the\n\u003e \u003e primary source of workflow management) goes directly against your\n\u003e \u003e proposal of wallet software as an workflow manager. So it is clear NACK\n\u003e \u003e for me.\n\u003e\n\u003e The current question – as already mentioned – is we ACK to work together\n\u003e on a signing protocol or if we NACK this before we even have started.\n\u003e\n\nACK for Ledger. What's necessary to sign a transaction is well known, I\ndon't see how driving any hardware wallet from the wallet itself or from a\nthird party daemon implementing that URL scheme would make any difference,\nother than providing better devices interoperability, as well as easier\nmaintenance and update paths for the wallets.\n\n-- \nNicolas Bacca | CTO, Ledger\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160818/cac3d457/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "17ba7848d747b157f780ba95805db9fbefdf970ad54ceb012e77397b46a25a96075ca39daa00731c42f83ea0a137248cb39643a1f02c8bd6ae71b3794d238e9c"
}