gel on Nostr: Yeah but consensus still caps the byte limit- otherwise we’d end up with another ...
Yeah but consensus still caps the byte limit- otherwise we’d end up with another hard fork which I really don’t think anyone wants
The primary problem is load on nodes… right now our best solution for network load is pruning which is actually quite useful but a lot of people think this is conspiracy because of the potential that pruned data could lack integrity
Nodes are supposed to check and balance miners
But like everyone voting for knots? I’m pretty sure it’s pruned but again I know very little about knots admittedly
And core is also pruned right
Tbh it’s safer for node operators to be running pruned data BUT we need full nodes too for archive to check the miners
I am, admittedly, biased towards mining operations simply because I know far more about that perspective than I do validating nodes
And I admittedly side with what I’m familiar with
Published at
2025-05-07 01:05:39Event JSON
{
"id": "817d1d7aa82350355e3f7d433c6ccef7648f5f41fdfd7bd11bcf1774ccc81894",
"pubkey": "ae4c17620c9b3a0413fd019fd7e983da43b2081e7169abecb7764c333a9bfff1",
"created_at": 1746579939,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b08256c76d1cad6b8f59099b05652227e83994c55903cac046d6770c52d182cd",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a523e1bc9394c1d6e33eff45a7ce3197f04590134c702ec13f7df3ebf15d0dcf",
"wss://nostr.oxtr.dev",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9f83869cafcfe6d34e30d46044bc81dd240858b29a1f6bf12e44efc8c6d53766",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "Yeah but consensus still caps the byte limit- otherwise we’d end up with another hard fork which I really don’t think anyone wants \n\nThe primary problem is load on nodes… right now our best solution for network load is pruning which is actually quite useful but a lot of people think this is conspiracy because of the potential that pruned data could lack integrity \n\nNodes are supposed to check and balance miners\n\nBut like everyone voting for knots? I’m pretty sure it’s pruned but again I know very little about knots admittedly \n\nAnd core is also pruned right \n\nTbh it’s safer for node operators to be running pruned data BUT we need full nodes too for archive to check the miners\n\nI am, admittedly, biased towards mining operations simply because I know far more about that perspective than I do validating nodes \n\nAnd I admittedly side with what I’m familiar with\n",
"sig": "5f103757a4cbefe1fda5414eda4d9de4c264bf093584ace37eb92961514ffb2198def2102f23be76d2a1f08c77d2d5d58800e8eebcea604d8f28df08827b2093"
}