📅 Original date posted:2015-01-04
📝 Original message:On 04/01/15 17:44, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can you send me the actual raw transaction (that site doesn't appear
>> have a way to get it, only some cooked json output; which doesn't
>> include the sequence number).
>
> Nevermind, I guess. I think I figured out your problem: The behaviour
> on testnet is busted because the non-mempooling is enforced by
> IsStandardTx which is bypassed in testnet. We should enforce that
> elsewhere.
>
> This isn't the case on the real network.
>
Ah, thanks for that.
I'll try Peter's patch for testnet tomorrow, sounds like it should fix
this for my use case.
Ross Nicoll [ARCHIVE] /
npub10p…pfaef
2023-06-07 15:28:21
in reply to nevent1q…a37v
Author Public Key
npub10plv6jx6pktpp5ezldnus6kj8ffg045g2kdjl78w23njrlveqy5s3pfaefPublished at
2023-06-07 15:28:21Event JSON
{
"id": "8258de9525df7a64aa9a8a79a273f9d17cb9fe248fbc15ba4bee428f24b2bec1",
"pubkey": "787ecd48da0d9610d322fb67c86ad23a5287d688559b2ff8ee546721fd990129",
"created_at": 1686151701,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c34c675aa013cba152c99a343668732650d019acd0488a1f1a5be9bc5fc8e1f8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9e1b4d026ad3fecffd1c801b961dc74ccd1af1ca16507a3002adf5c4208d4950",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-01-04\n📝 Original message:On 04/01/15 17:44, Gregory Maxwell wrote:\n\u003e On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Gregory Maxwell \u003cgmaxwell at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e Can you send me the actual raw transaction (that site doesn't appear\n\u003e\u003e have a way to get it, only some cooked json output; which doesn't\n\u003e\u003e include the sequence number).\n\u003e \n\u003e Nevermind, I guess. I think I figured out your problem: The behaviour\n\u003e on testnet is busted because the non-mempooling is enforced by\n\u003e IsStandardTx which is bypassed in testnet. We should enforce that\n\u003e elsewhere.\n\u003e \n\u003e This isn't the case on the real network.\n\u003e \n\nAh, thanks for that.\n\nI'll try Peter's patch for testnet tomorrow, sounds like it should fix\nthis for my use case.",
"sig": "7df173484e22ea4bad7dc8291c475fe1295a3ae128c84dfb9ab769d6311aa32a37e42e7ce848f964ca0cfa2b8c1d56e6c637af8cf2b58cf25b6a95ded104b823"
}