Event JSON
{
"id": "87387528f2141caa985e09ec3dd3d09c49eee8e097cd7fa35c9e8eb14a8a692e",
"pubkey": "c71a5284689572bfd0beef4cbb9b331e25b49be5535123c2692f4a13e17c0a48",
"created_at": 1693915612,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e8c858d86f7e55b889c14d714da0985c06f80cef0bfdd768c8c62a17298adb4e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"6321964ed56abf7932ffe516a583daf8fa65cbc694b8a1f45104864ee616d77f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"aea6da747809495d3d20f8abb0da37bdf92c36213a03f3ec24783d90cc94aaa1",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"25cd6a928e28c1f79c3b7552b54d8b342c1ea4abe9820ed0c84ffd1546fbe5d9",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://neuromatch.social/users/NicoleCRust/statuses/111012453557938392",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "On jargon - is it useful?\n\nIs it necessary and useful for scientists to say \"mnemonic\" to refer to \"memory\" and \"affect\" to talk about \"emotion\"?\n\nIn other words, given that everyone understand emotion and mood and no one really understands what \"affect\" is until you are really deep into things, why is the term affect useful and important at all? And should we reserve it for deep dives (as opposed to public facing websites and such)? And does anyone call themselves an \"emotion researcher?\" or a \"mood researcher?\"\n\nnostr:npub1ary93kr00e2m3zwpf4c5mgyctsr0sr80p07aw6xgcc4pw2v2md8qe5md4c nostr:npub1vvsevnk4d2lhjvhlu5t2tq76lraxtj7xjju2raz3qjryaesk6als0jk2yk",
"sig": "81de27a95b141af8679f36c589135fb0e8a0530e991670dbee079aa654860d25e746c60f66aafa27cbd8885e56c88ed5f58b5615f5f66a46ea800f4c144219f5"
}