📅 Original date posted:2015-08-12
📝 Original message:On Wednesday 12. August 2015 10.51.57 Jorge Timón wrote:
> > Personally I think its a bad idea to do write the way you do, which is
that
> > some people have to prove that bad things will happen if we don't make a
> > certain change. It polarizes the discussion and puts people into camps.
> > Peoplehave to choose sides.
>
> Whatever,
No, please don't just say "whatever". Show some respect, please.
If you have the courage to say people are spreading FUD you really should
have already exhausted all possible avenues of cooperation.
Now you look like you give up and blame others.
> I just give up trying that people worried about a non-increase in the short
> term answer to me that question. I will internally think that they just
> want to spread fud, but not vey vocal about it.
Again, I've been trying really hard to give you answers, straight answers.
It saddens me if you really are giving up trying to understand what people
equally enthusiastic about this technology may see that you don't see.
> It's just seems strange to me that you don't want to prove to me that's not
> the case when it is so easy to do so: just answer the d@#/&m question.
In the evolution of Bitcoin over the next couple of years we need bigger
blocks for a lot of different reasons. One of them is that LN isn't here.
The other is that we have known bugs that we have to fix, and that will take
time. Time we are running out of.
To buy more time, get bigger blocks now.
Anyway, I dislike your approach, as I said in the previous mail.
Its not about people spreading FUD or sidestepping the question, it is about
keeping the discussion civilised. You are essentially the one that asks;
"if you are not beating your wife, please prove it to me".
And the you get upset when I try to steer the conversation into less
black/white situations...
And, yes, that analogy is apt because you can't prove either.
--
Thomas Zander
Thomas Zander [ARCHIVE] /
npub1du…vyg93
2023-06-07 17:34:10
in reply to nevent1q…gz5c
Author Public Key
npub1du3xh5wgds32a5fweqkd9k45kh30wl7kv2kyu8ugz9c2ztdg00tqqvyg93Published at
2023-06-07 17:34:10Event JSON
{
"id": "8700f2897079b8c616f970fefe67cd142e92b6f566b54a6b99db2f7e4fa4a372",
"pubkey": "6f226bd1c86c22aed12ec82cd2dab4b5e2f77fd662ac4e1f881170a12da87bd6",
"created_at": 1686159250,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0be39125a55b736c93365735a614c6c3adbad06ad3effa6f21e6b42bef7ccb51",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b5e589a48ce59cca93cb0fd9df7488002d106c83fce02cd1021955e885e6ab09",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-12\n📝 Original message:On Wednesday 12. August 2015 10.51.57 Jorge Timón wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Personally I think its a bad idea to do write the way you do, which is \nthat\n\u003e \u003e some people have to prove that bad things will happen if we don't make a\n\u003e \u003e certain change. It polarizes the discussion and puts people into camps.\n\u003e \u003e Peoplehave to choose sides.\n\u003e \n\u003e Whatever,\n\nNo, please don't just say \"whatever\". Show some respect, please.\n\nIf you have the courage to say people are spreading FUD you really should \nhave already exhausted all possible avenues of cooperation.\nNow you look like you give up and blame others.\n\n\u003e I just give up trying that people worried about a non-increase in the short\n\u003e term answer to me that question. I will internally think that they just\n\u003e want to spread fud, but not vey vocal about it.\n\nAgain, I've been trying really hard to give you answers, straight answers.\nIt saddens me if you really are giving up trying to understand what people \nequally enthusiastic about this technology may see that you don't see.\n\n\u003e It's just seems strange to me that you don't want to prove to me that's not\n\u003e the case when it is so easy to do so: just answer the d@#/\u0026m question.\n\nIn the evolution of Bitcoin over the next couple of years we need bigger \nblocks for a lot of different reasons. One of them is that LN isn't here.\nThe other is that we have known bugs that we have to fix, and that will take \ntime. Time we are running out of.\nTo buy more time, get bigger blocks now.\n\nAnyway, I dislike your approach, as I said in the previous mail.\nIts not about people spreading FUD or sidestepping the question, it is about \nkeeping the discussion civilised. You are essentially the one that asks;\n \"if you are not beating your wife, please prove it to me\".\nAnd the you get upset when I try to steer the conversation into less \nblack/white situations...\nAnd, yes, that analogy is apt because you can't prove either.\n\n-- \nThomas Zander",
"sig": "6ba070cf74b9413de6a43c357281c6517d1588e3eb70bdffa1f784e103d13c6baa545a75746d2e0954ff256180408d13b6c89f928b31cd3eadd3506e6a0dde86"
}