📅 Original date posted:2020-10-08
📝 Original message:On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 11:00 AM David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Rather than go through that again, I'd prefer we use the
> backwards compatible proposal from BIPs PR#945 and, if we want to
> maximize safety, consensus restrict v1 witness program size, e.g. reject
> transactions with scriptPubKeys paying v1 witness programs that aren't
> exactly 32 bytes.
>
Adding some kind of relay policy rule would be easier than a consensus
rule, and maybe effective enough. (This comment is not intended to endorse
any one proposal over another.)
> Hopefully by the time we want to use segwit v2, most software will have
> implemented length limits and so we won't need any additional consensus
> restrictions from then on forward.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20201008/e79a6702/attachment.html>;
Russell O'Connor [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dw…8plrw
2023-06-07 18:27:22
in reply to nevent1q…uu4q
Author Public Key
npub1dw88wd5gqsqn6ufxhf9h03uk8087l7gfzdtez5csjlt6pupu4pwsj8plrwPublished at
2023-06-07 18:27:22Event JSON
{
"id": "8e2ec6c1e03c6f86eb7556b7b71cd91592f1cfc2a5c8353b85c64cc8839c376f",
"pubkey": "6b8e77368804013d7126ba4b77c7963bcfeff909135791531097d7a0f03ca85d",
"created_at": 1686162442,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4783c6c909b78f666abf4f62da363dc4a252b6e15f69428bf595d553895a198d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"546bd0b7b68e7d9c62d9f8285b1f6caa8a5f0758824dbbdea25a598403153a47",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d3574a24208f4e3d0821bb4a69a0c3ae842043d444fa5c4a8c49c369918a6fb2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2020-10-08\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 11:00 AM David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Rather than go through that again, I'd prefer we use the\n\u003e backwards compatible proposal from BIPs PR#945 and, if we want to\n\u003e maximize safety, consensus restrict v1 witness program size, e.g. reject\n\u003e transactions with scriptPubKeys paying v1 witness programs that aren't\n\u003e exactly 32 bytes.\n\u003e\n\nAdding some kind of relay policy rule would be easier than a consensus\nrule, and maybe effective enough. (This comment is not intended to endorse\nany one proposal over another.)\n\n\n\u003e Hopefully by the time we want to use segwit v2, most software will have\n\u003e implemented length limits and so we won't need any additional consensus\n\u003e restrictions from then on forward.\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20201008/e79a6702/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "76e74f6bd516ee4ea1887c9a912c38dd99a2e9a61647ea41ae2b9aff727abecb2cdcaee704b785a25571b66f5ed29f063196a177238ae629dabc04316419c115"
}