ingo on Nostr: My main takeaway was that the often described "natural" historical evolution path of ...
My main takeaway was that the often described "natural" historical evolution path of barter, shells, gold, banking etc don't have any sufficient antropologic proof of being true.
And if not true, why is that story so often told and who benifits from it being presented?
Published at
2023-03-16 05:28:25Event JSON
{
"id": "8e412396a26289c8f6781afd74751d15b79f3ced5e7262590935587e2f676158",
"pubkey": "d4a41f3ef159728c9838023434d1f2ffedde5fd6a814989c04b1ad95dec146a1",
"created_at": 1678944505,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"99e9b7fa0e897e3ef37bb707fdb14deea6c549f2f7f61aeb6b23378ca3c9d77d"
],
[
"p",
"eab0e756d32b80bcd464f3d844b8040303075a13eabc3599a762c9ac7ab91f4f"
]
],
"content": "My main takeaway was that the often described \"natural\" historical evolution path of barter, shells, gold, banking etc don't have any sufficient antropologic proof of being true.\nAnd if not true, why is that story so often told and who benifits from it being presented?",
"sig": "b64fef9f32466e2a96ee44630a67388a1cbd41138c2cf2a34f81184b6a60a318f6f745bdf0551bbdbd16a7021c02bd22eeef4e5c3f6ac3f950dd5e36a96f2be5"
}
