Martin Sustrik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-10-23 📝 Original message:On 23/10/13 21:40, Peter ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-10-23
📝 Original message:On 23/10/13 21:40, Peter Todd wrote:
> The reference implementation is the specification - the "specification"
> on the wiki is best thought of as a set of Coles Notes on the real
> specification. If you don't already understand that and the nuance of
> that statement you should assume the protocol is fixed in stone and
> doesn't evolve at all; that statement is not quite true, but it's very
> close to the truth.
Does that imply that the notes are deliberately obscured to force
everyone to check the source code?
Martin
Published at
2023-06-07 15:07:47Event JSON
{
"id": "883beac0d944f791469ece18e1fd1a88b27200f82e570905cd199306e7b29558",
"pubkey": "a07382f2047b309ebb8303d291bbe36556308187afdeaea697a464e7d3a93c53",
"created_at": 1686150467,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7825845c40e7246842c64e1640ea39dcb04d6d8f430fae7ba311b465db0e4d0f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f50bdb4a2c197bf0fa5aaa21fd2d292d87881377df331f635b55a0f6bf4d4384",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-10-23\n📝 Original message:On 23/10/13 21:40, Peter Todd wrote:\n\n\u003e The reference implementation is the specification - the \"specification\"\n\u003e on the wiki is best thought of as a set of Coles Notes on the real\n\u003e specification. If you don't already understand that and the nuance of\n\u003e that statement you should assume the protocol is fixed in stone and\n\u003e doesn't evolve at all; that statement is not quite true, but it's very\n\u003e close to the truth.\n\nDoes that imply that the notes are deliberately obscured to force \neveryone to check the source code?\n\nMartin",
"sig": "dd46df9238ca84d1e0cda839135bb63126f827a6ba9fda8d9c117b5a369e4d0f668149a8a20ce0272937da0d36751e16eaa7651df036b8ea3f3cc6e7eab72f0e"
}