The tone and the line of questioning is perceivably antaganostic and hostile for unknown reasons. Much has been stated with great confidence however lacking substance and demonstrating a lack of use and familiarity of the very thing having remarks laid against it.
> Does GrapheneOS allow to choose which type of connection applications can use like in DivestOS?
👇
>Network Restriction: DivestOS already lets you restrict network for each app by connection type (cellular/Wi-Fi/VPN), when in the background, and optionally completely revoke NETWORK permission.
Yes GrapheneOS has the exact same functionality, DivestOS Network toggle is the exact same developed by GrapheneOS.
> GrapheneOS is not a reliable project because unreliable people stand behind it.
Remarkable claim with unremarkable evidence. You'll likely tout clout chasing trust abusing and extortionist "influencers" claims, where one in particular is a card carrying Kiwi Farms member immersed in their targeted harrassment campaigns being encouraged and encouraging in equal measure. Unreliable narrators all.
> Another thing is that GrapheneOS builds a walled garden and forces people to use their servers. You claim that you're security espert. Have you noticed that GOS forces to use their server to sync the clock? Maybe you think that you can have accurate time using manual setting?
Nobody is walled in, nobody is forced to use anything, all default connections are routed via GOS servers or proxies but can be done through stock Google or other provider. Users can use either/or OR none dependent on the connection in question.
> GOS is a perfect tool to fingerprint and track journalist and dissidents.
This is why Edward Snowden Chair of Freedom of the Press Foundation uses it every day and Citizenlabs team members have recommended it to high value targets etc.
> DivestOS allows to make updates over Tor, DivestOS has repository with apps within Tor- .onion address.
DivestOS has .onion address of their site.
Our updater will update the app via any connection if using Orbot/VPN etc.
Can you provide any details of GOS to confirm claim that GOS is pro privacy and has astonishing approach to the security vs. DivestOS?
grapheneos.org all auditable and verifiable should anyone choose to do so.
Can you provide any details to backup your extraordinary claims?
MetropleX [GrapheneOS] ⚡🟣
npub1gd…7cn8c
2024-01-12 23:05:26
in reply to nevent1q…wnhr
Author Public Key
npub1gd3h5vg6zhcuy5a46crh32m4gjkx8xugu95wwgj2jqx55sfgxxpst7cn8cPublished at
2024-01-12 23:05:26Event JSON
{
"id": "882c668953d80d53042137fce4068a56d1e89aa8ebee46b699fcf35d79f30084",
"pubkey": "43637a311a15f1c253b5d60778ab7544ac639b88e168e7224a900d4a41283183",
"created_at": 1705100726,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7b5d99224460719215a0e5211a1fb0e901ea27d80f373bf971877d861df38069",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"bc54846024ad223ecb4db9eb1ae43a0b60941b4fec5168728d9e9834bfef179e"
],
[
"e",
"9115c95007f00899d20459a80a4f0fb030d2ca21e4044246e8e9f19fd5f82fda"
],
[
"e",
"058084218b6c00df536e36377f9eb3e99803463c8f50942e819eac0b3d6b16c0"
],
[
"e",
"c3da4ae34390a208da176ab33a067829c59e1fb238430d5db99602be44f263af",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"43637a311a15f1c253b5d60778ab7544ac639b88e168e7224a900d4a41283183"
],
[
"p",
"96b171f10322e2a78e82663584157999e095a702119bf7fdc75e0e452feebf5e"
],
[
"p",
"4eb88310d6b4ed95c6d66a395b3d3cf559b85faec8f7691dafd405a92e055d6d"
],
[
"r",
"grapheneos.org"
]
],
"content": "The tone and the line of questioning is perceivably antaganostic and hostile for unknown reasons. Much has been stated with great confidence however lacking substance and demonstrating a lack of use and familiarity of the very thing having remarks laid against it.\n\n\u003e Does GrapheneOS allow to choose which type of connection applications can use like in DivestOS?\n👇\n\n\u003eNetwork Restriction: DivestOS already lets you restrict network for each app by connection type (cellular/Wi-Fi/VPN), when in the background, and optionally completely revoke NETWORK permission.\n\nYes GrapheneOS has the exact same functionality, DivestOS Network toggle is the exact same developed by GrapheneOS.\n\n\u003e GrapheneOS is not a reliable project because unreliable people stand behind it. \n\nRemarkable claim with unremarkable evidence. You'll likely tout clout chasing trust abusing and extortionist \"influencers\" claims, where one in particular is a card carrying Kiwi Farms member immersed in their targeted harrassment campaigns being encouraged and encouraging in equal measure. Unreliable narrators all.\n\n\u003e Another thing is that GrapheneOS builds a walled garden and forces people to use their servers. You claim that you're security espert. Have you noticed that GOS forces to use their server to sync the clock? Maybe you think that you can have accurate time using manual setting?\n\nNobody is walled in, nobody is forced to use anything, all default connections are routed via GOS servers or proxies but can be done through stock Google or other provider. Users can use either/or OR none dependent on the connection in question.\n\n\u003e GOS is a perfect tool to fingerprint and track journalist and dissidents.\n\nThis is why Edward Snowden Chair of Freedom of the Press Foundation uses it every day and Citizenlabs team members have recommended it to high value targets etc.\n\n\u003e DivestOS allows to make updates over Tor, DivestOS has repository with apps within Tor- .onion address.\nDivestOS has .onion address of their site.\n\nOur updater will update the app via any connection if using Orbot/VPN etc.\n\nCan you provide any details of GOS to confirm claim that GOS is pro privacy and has astonishing approach to the security vs. DivestOS?\n\ngrapheneos.org all auditable and verifiable should anyone choose to do so.\n\nCan you provide any details to backup your extraordinary claims?",
"sig": "021a9b218ad6f579911885f1e5876338631b4e466913caec5569abf1d7b5994236b6b681bfe09aff68dda49129fbe9bef7bd7146313e0841263fc22f58bbd10c"
}