Teri Kanefield on Nostr: Answering this question⤵️ It's not that easy. The standard is ineffective ...
Answering this question⤵️
It's not that easy. The standard is ineffective assistance of counsel. The standard is here:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/ineffective_assistance_of_counselIt pits the client against the lawyer. The client has to prove:
🔹 Their trial lawyer's conduct fell below an "objective standard of reasonableness" and,
🔹 "a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors,” the outcome of the criminal proceeding would have been different.
In addition . . .
1/
Published at
2023-10-03 03:13:03Event JSON
{
"id": "89c8e073abb5b28e2261a264e750368a2482de86b79742a0c674dfe2f8c6cc45",
"pubkey": "7b5c79d9965ee3659fc4f823fae679e3b94c0b025f078f4d0db45a339572c06a",
"created_at": 1696302783,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://law-and-politics.online/users/Teri_Kanefield/statuses/111168899202027599",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Answering this question⤵️ \n\nIt's not that easy. The standard is ineffective assistance of counsel. The standard is here:\nhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/ineffective_assistance_of_counsel\n\nIt pits the client against the lawyer. The client has to prove:\n\n🔹 Their trial lawyer's conduct fell below an \"objective standard of reasonableness\" and, \n🔹 \"a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors,” the outcome of the criminal proceeding would have been different.\n\nIn addition . . . \n\n1/\n\nhttps://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/lapmastodon/media_attachments/files/111/168/884/444/311/487/original/c531cb6ebf66e950.png",
"sig": "8c1f78d43948421ba82235f062d4a36226acc89e2c6e28e8544cc14450c31930b2aea30b4b8057ab990b3d7aba5d463f5c1644ae32721622f6f8c70ca450957a"
}
