📅 Original date posted:2012-07-16
📝 Original message:On Monday, July 16, 2012 11:47:02 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Vladimir does raise a fair point, though. Hackathon seems appropriate
> for bitcoin.org as it is focused on dev-related activities. (full
> disclosure: speaking at bitcoin2012.com) The conference might or
> might not be. The conference does seem community focused, so I don't
> object to it being on bitcoin.org... But if consensus prefers
> otherwise, that's OK too.
IMO, bitcoin.org is more community-focussed anyway.
How often do devs use the site, compared to GitHub etc?
Someone else made a pullreq for Bitcoin Magazine; I suggest(ed) that
for-profit organizations should be asked to pitch in some way or another.
Who should organize that, I don't know. If Bitcoin Consultancy/Amir is behind
the conference, I suggest their/his development contributions should be
sufficient in that respect.
> PS. This seems like material for pull requests, which is preferred
> over mailing list email + git push. When working on the satoshi
> client, we all ACK each other's pull req for anything beyond the
> trivial.
I concur, this should be discussed in a pullreq.
Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dt…u7wrs
2023-06-07 10:23:04
in reply to nevent1q…cg8s
Author Public Key
npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrsPublished at
2023-06-07 10:23:04Event JSON
{
"id": "8dda72a6f8294237cbd23585ad4d108d3cc4f2cacba9dd57cd41b6c271a34aa3",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686133384,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6758e46f5b40f3ce947ac29a9dc45f323ebb98faa9aeb2d398b914535b466fc3",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"eaedbe3c62006498fe411ab708ec7774e785baee068d0d3a3ecfeebf532a8e76",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-07-16\n📝 Original message:On Monday, July 16, 2012 11:47:02 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e Vladimir does raise a fair point, though. Hackathon seems appropriate\n\u003e for bitcoin.org as it is focused on dev-related activities. (full\n\u003e disclosure: speaking at bitcoin2012.com) The conference might or\n\u003e might not be. The conference does seem community focused, so I don't\n\u003e object to it being on bitcoin.org... But if consensus prefers\n\u003e otherwise, that's OK too.\n\nIMO, bitcoin.org is more community-focussed anyway.\nHow often do devs use the site, compared to GitHub etc?\n\nSomeone else made a pullreq for Bitcoin Magazine; I suggest(ed) that\nfor-profit organizations should be asked to pitch in some way or another.\nWho should organize that, I don't know. If Bitcoin Consultancy/Amir is behind \nthe conference, I suggest their/his development contributions should be \nsufficient in that respect.\n\n\u003e PS. This seems like material for pull requests, which is preferred\n\u003e over mailing list email + git push. When working on the satoshi\n\u003e client, we all ACK each other's pull req for anything beyond the\n\u003e trivial.\n\nI concur, this should be discussed in a pullreq.",
"sig": "2d89e4e06744bee8dd18976c67fdb90783a02a7d43e33d0762f3586caac4431624727b07345affda4a5d9fe875c5861cb9c9508667d14ea222c3795bc5ab7594"
}